We have a 4-node cluster with shared storage with clvm.
Promox4, afaik, doesn't support clvm, cause no cman. Isn't it?
Is there any option to continue using clvm with proxmox?
What is the best option to migrate storage to for us?
Sorry.
This workaround as slow as main process, nothing went wrong except speed.
Backup to local storage and backup to NFS have no difference in speed.
ok. Let's start once more.
The only performance problem with MTU 9000 - is slow vzdump.
Guest r/w performance is good.
Host to SAN is good.
Switch configured to max mtu to 9216
Really? Why?
I've made a tests - so if I grow up mtu to 9000 - I have over 300mb/s transfer in guests.
With 1500 - it only 90-100.
The question is why backup (and only backup) speed dropped down with raising mtu to 9000.
I have a 3-node cluster, with IBM v3700 storage system connected via iSCSI over 10Gbit ethernet.
To efficiently use 10Gbit we decided to set mtu from 1500 to 9000, and noticied that backup speed dropped significantly - from 80MB/S
to 1MB/S
I've changed MTU back to 1500 and speed gone back to...
Can't load ISCSI offload driver
what's the problem? how to fix this?
uname -a
Linux virt07 2.6.32-27-pve #1 SMP Tue Feb 11 16:18:29 CET 2014 x86_64 GNU/Linux
modprobe bnx2i
ERROR: could not insert 'bnx2i': Unknown symbol in module, or unknown parameter (see dmesg)
dmesg | tail
bnx2i...
We have a IBM v3700 storage, and 10Gbit iSCSI-offload enabled ethernet cards, and 2 10G switches. Storage also have 2 10G cards.
We planning to connect host1 and storage (via switch1 and switch2), and host2 (via switch1 and switch2).
In my mind, the best way is to cluster hosts with shared...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.