Search results

Reading the cluster chapter of the manual, there is this paragraph: "At this point you must power off hp4 and make sure that it will not power on again (in the network) as it is. As said above, it is critical to power off the node before removal, and make sure that it will never power on again...

I am running a PVE 5.0 instance in a Dell T110II with 32 Gb of RAM. It has 1 container with postgresql (150Gb of databases heavily used) on SDD and one 1Gb Virtual machine with almost not use on HDD and it is fast. BTRFS use VFS caching provided by kernel and it is fast. At the same time it is...

so the steps to solve this install problem are: sudo apt remove pve-firmware proxmox-ve sudo apt remove firmware-amd-graphics sudo apt install proxmox-ve postfix open-iscsi after that I could finish the installation

Hello I was installing Proxmox 5 on an AMD box by installing Debian 9 first and upgrading to Proxmox 5. Package pve-firmware failed and Proxmox 5 installation stopped: Preparing to unpack .../229-pve-firmware_2.0-2_all.deb ... Unpacking pve-firmware (2.0-2) ... dpkg: error processing archive...

I want to give it zero extra memory, no cache and I want it delivers fast like the wind. BTRFS let me do that. The prize is that its volumes will not last longer than ZFS volumes. I am good with that by compensating with backups + time to restore them. My scenario is not common. We are...

I like BTRFS because it is simpler than ZFS to manage (for me). I like of it that I can convert a volume from simple to duplicated (data/metadata duplicated in the same volume) to RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 10 and back again online without interruptions while it is being used. I am not crazy so I am...

I am doing that. Keep my backups in synchro with local and remote destinations and I do not promise what I cannot deliver. It is good advice and I appreciate it.

I did some experiments. Speed improvements using chattr +C are marginal in my postgresql deployment. As @guletz pointed, it kinds of defeat the purpose of using btrfs if we deactivate cow and the 12% extra performance does not really pays off. I will continue using cow in this configuration. I...

I am running PVE 5.0-23 CPU % in top reports correctly the right %CPU. Only uptime have issues.

I did not do it. I am collecting some stats this week. I will apply next week so I have enough stats to compare.

Hello First, I want to thanks and express my admiration to proxmox team and their great job! I am evaluating proxmox using 1 node and I would like to report my progress. I installed a PVE node by creating a Debian 9 server and installing Proxmox 5.0 on top. I used btrfs as the main filesystem...

Hello I executed in a ubuntu 14.04 LXC container the command: top And I get: bad data in /proc/uptime bad data in /proc/uptime bad data in /proc/uptime bad data in /proc/uptime in the console. Perhaps the LCX container software distributed in Proxmox was hit by...

Hello I installed Debian 9.0 and over it I installed PVE 5.0 and I got this error message. [ 13.355869] AVX version of gcm_enc/dec engaged. [ 13.355870] AES CTR mode by8 optimization enabled [ 13.376150] Error: Driver 'pcspkr' is already registered, aborting... Before that message it...