Search results

Yes, I have a serial console configured, because I'm able to use xterm.js by opening it manually from the "Console" button

I've set xtermjs as default but VM Console is still novnc

I've upgraded some packages (full upgrade will be made in the following days) and now the javascript console tab is missing. I did many times before this "partial" upgrade with no issue at all (i'm just upgrading the web interface)

No issues with gluster? I was a strong advocate of gluster but development seems to be out of control and with no quality check There was a corruption bug for years, fixed more or less 2 years after discovery, now there seems to be another corruption bug That's a shame, gluster is very interesting

Interesting. Which storage are you using ?

Would be interesting (for all nerds reading this forum, I think :-D ) to know the hardware size and specs of these huge install.

Stupid question, but I admit, I was never been able to measure IOPS and read/write throuhgput. I have a Xen node with 8x SAS 15k disks in hardware RAID-6 (512MB write cache) that I would like to replace with a Proxmox server. My idea is: can I replace this server with a new one by using ZFS...

If you want to drive a car, you have to go to a driving school. Is not a car-vendor issue if you don't know how to use the gears. Every system need a little bit of study, this is not Windows where you just press "Next" hoping that something will work as you exepect Try to use Xen if you think...

I have a RAIDZ-2 made of 4x 480GB. More or less 800GB of usable space. How much free space I have and how much free space can I still use for both backups and VM (stored on different volumes) This is not clear from the web interface

The used space yes, but root fs is shown as 395GB of total space. As total space is the same for both, root and data volumes, the same total space should be shown.

# zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT rpool 482G 351G 140K /rpool rpool/ROOT 44.2G 351G 140K /rpool/ROOT rpool/ROOT/pve-1 44.2G 351G 44.2G / rpool/data 429G 351G 140K /rpool/data...

I'm using ZFS. In storage node, on the web interce, I see "local-zfs" and "local". Both are created over the same ZFS raid because i don't have any extra disk installed. The current visualization is messy bacause is showing that "local" has 44used over 395GB and "local-zfs" is 428GB/780...

Thread is related to Gluster and your docs talk about gluster thus i don't see anything bad in my post because even with lxc you still have to resync in case of disk failure.

Related to gluster: the pve wiki is wrong i suggest a check https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/wiki-storage-glusterfs.34204/

Thank you. I've looked here: https://ark.intel.com/products/120522/Intel-SSD-DC-S4600-Series-480GB-2_5in-SATA-6Gbs-3D1-TLC and no DWPD is wrote :) So, this S4600 could be safely used as replacement for S3610, with the advantace that this has 3 times the IOPS than S3610 And what about Samsung...

Storage. I think that S3710 is still EOL, because is the same "family" of S3610 SM863a is slower (referred to IOPS) than SM863 (previous gen)

From the intel specs. Where did you get the DWPD for the S4600?

Setting 'serial0' doesn't allow xtermjs to see the whole POST phase, but only from grub (because in grub i've set "console=ttyS0,115200") and it breaks novnc. I've reverted to "default"

Bump. No idea?

Seems that S3610 is EOL. intel told me that the proper replacement is S4600. I don't agree too much, because S3610 is MLC with high-endurance, 3.3DWPD, S4600 doesn't have that endurance and is TLC What is strange is that writes IOPS for S3610 are about 20.000, but on the S4600 are near 60.000...