Search results

  1. K

    [SOLVED] Can't figure out what's blocking ports

    The host/network address determines routing. With a /32 subnet, the host will expect all traffic to go via the gateway. This is fine for hosts that are the other side of the gateway but will/may impact its communications with neighbouring hosts. You have the perfect tool to test all this! Create...
  2. K

    [SOLVED] Can't figure out what's blocking ports

    There's nothing wrong with it. I pointed it out because it is less usual and may not have been intentional.
  3. K

    [SOLVED] Can't figure out what's blocking ports

    Also note the netmask in your container config: ip=192.168.2.49/32
  4. K

    [SOLVED] Can't figure out what's blocking ports

    The container PID 467 (port 3000) is listening on loopback interface.
  5. K

    Not enough space in PVE-Root

    I am not familiar with Virtualizor. However if these 'template files' are the main culprit, then maybe create a thinpool backed volume as you suggested, but mounted in the existing root fs somewhere appropriate (/var/lib/virtualizor-templates or where ever Virtualizor expects to find them).
  6. K

    Not enough space in PVE-Root

    If you manage to achieve that, you will end up with a very unusual setup that's likely to cause problems down the road (booting, kernel upgrades etc). Also, if space is at such a premium, what do you plan on doing with the original root volume? I'd look at why your root fs is so full and remedy...
  7. K

    Not enough space in PVE-Root

    If there's no free space in VG pve and you don't want to add additonal PVs to the VG pve, then you need to shrink pve/data first. Good luck.
  8. K

    Not enough space in PVE-Root

    If you have free space in the pve VG, you can allocate additional storage from it to /pve/root. Then resize the filesytem. If there's no space available from that VG, you need to add some first. Which generally means adding additional PVs (partitions or entire disks) to the VG. Alternatively...
  9. K

    [SOLVED] Datastore backup without remote PBS

    'no_root_squash' is needed in the relevant share definition in `/etc/exports` on the NFS server. Your export config depends to some extent on whether you are using NFS v4. But PBS should be able to mount any NFS version. Check to see if datastore structure (chunk store etc) exists. `ls -al...
  10. K

    [SOLVED] Datastore backup without remote PBS

    I'd avoid rsyncing the datastore. I only tested backing up a few containers as I've currently no spare SSD to dedicate to datastores. But both removable media and NFS worked for me. For syncing to a datastore on removable media, you need to manage the datastore after inserting media and prior...
  11. K

    [SOLVED] Datastore backup without remote PBS

    Are you looking for PBS datastore on a removable drive or an NFS mount?
  12. K

    [SOLVED] Datastore backup without remote PBS

    Just to update this query. I followed @Dunuin advice: Set up a second datastore to pull backups from the first datastore on a manual schedule. I then tried putting the second datastore on an NFS mounted volume. Whilst datastore creation was very slow (as per other posts), once set up the sync...
  13. K

    [SOLVED] Datastore backup without remote PBS

    I assumed the sync ran continuously but reading further seems it is schedule based. So for my use case, I guess I need to disable schedules and run sync job manually. Or script running of the sync job.
  14. K

    [SOLVED] Datastore backup without remote PBS

    That sounds good. Thanks for the recommendation. How would you control the sync process to accomodate a removable drive?
  15. K

    [SOLVED] Datastore backup without remote PBS

    Regarding backup of a datastore when there's no remote PBS to sync to. I'd thought to periodically rsync the datastore to a removable drive and restore same way if needed. Presumably I need to halt the backup service. Is there a better approach? Thanks.
  16. K

    Rejected Mail - but SPF record seems to be ok

    Is it possible to perform the spf check (sending MTA IP & sender domain) with verbose output from the command line in PMG?
  17. K

    Rejected Mail - but SPF record seems to be ok

    Thanks @poetry. Using this tool, which checks IP vs SPF record, the IP is designated. I've rarely encountered SPF fails with my PMG installation and the only reason I looked in to this one was the fact the mail was anticipated. AIUI pfsense the rebind protection relates to stripping RFC1918...
  18. K

    Rejected Mail - but SPF record seems to be ok

    Sorry for resurrecting this topic but it seems the best place to ask my question. I noticed and spf reject for an apparently valid IP. Nov 17 10:18:42 smtp postfix/smtpd[304690]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from mailgwln03.rightnowtech.com[147.154.227.175]: 554 5.7.1 <user@mydomain.com>: Recipient...
  19. K

    [SOLVED] PMG statistics pages display and accept invalid date selection

    Thanks Dominik. I keep forgetting to search the development lists. I will mark this as solved.
  20. K

    [SOLVED] PMG statistics pages display and accept invalid date selection

    @dcsapak ~# pmgversion -v proxmox-mailgateway-container: 7.1-2 (API: 7.1-7/4d02e400, running kernel: 5.15.60-1-pve) pmg-api: 7.1-7 pmg-gui: 3.1-4 clamav-daemon: 0.103.7+dfsg-0+deb11u1 ifupdown: residual config ifupdown2: 3.1.0-1+pmx3 libarchive-perl: 3.4.0-1 libjs-extjs: 7.0.0-1...

About

The Proxmox community has been around for many years and offers help and support for Proxmox VE, Proxmox Backup Server, and Proxmox Mail Gateway.
We think our community is one of the best thanks to people like you!

Get your subscription!

The Proxmox team works very hard to make sure you are running the best software and getting stable updates and security enhancements, as well as quick enterprise support. Tens of thousands of happy customers have a Proxmox subscription. Get yours easily in our online shop.

Buy now!