Search results

Thank you. Thats solved my issue.

Thanks for your reply. Apologies for using the wrong terminology. I should have said (support) subcription not license. Nonetheless, would it generate revenue if you offered a way for users to "subscribe" and simply remove the nag message? This subscription would do nothing other than removing...

I was remiss in not saying thank you for your response, so "thank you" :)

As mentioned in this thread, you can make the message go away by modifying the code, but this is not the forum to discuss this and I don't want to take anything away from what the developers have done so far as it truly is a great piece of software(s). However tburger, I like your thinking...

I tend to agree with Luke1 in that the message seems more of a "you must have a valid subscription" message, especially as theres a yellow warning triangle to the left. I've been using Proxmox for years and love it ans simply dismiss the box each login but perhaps this message could do with...

I'm trying to create a backup of a CT using a new PBS. The PBS Storage is shown correctly in the Proxmox interface, so I assume that I have entered the correct credentials, however when trying to run a manual backup to the PBS I get a 255 exit code (see below with personal details redacted for...

Ok after racking my brains I came up with a solution: Install a new drive (USB, SCSI, SATA) and create a new VG. After which I can format the new drive as Linux LVM and then add the space to the existing LV However I found that the existing VG had a small amount of free space (16GB) which I...

I've done something really stupid. I've allocated 300GB of space to a LXC container but my Logical Volume only has 233GB. This was ok, until the LXC started to use more and now will not boot. The Volume group and Physical volume also have no space left. Is there anything I can do to...

After adjusting /etc/pve/corosync.conf accordingly i restarted the services as suggested, but still no connectivity. Should I restart each node?

I'll check journalctl or dmesg, but ive just been told that ip multicast is not supported on the vLAN that my nodes use. Could this be the issue?

node 1 --------- auto lo iface lo inet loopback iface eno1 inet manual iface eno2 inet manual auto vmbr0 iface vmbr0 inet static address x.x.x.x netmask 255.255.255.0 gateway x.x.x.1 bridge-ports eno1 bridge-stp off bridge-fd 0 auto vmbr1...

I've configured NTP now for both nodes and this seems to be synced. Im also reaching out to the DC who provide the vLAN to ask if they support multicast on their vLANS. I now have a different error message: "No route to host (595)" Oddly the node summary graphs all seem to be up to date so...

I hope sopmeone can help? I have two nodes in a cluster, both have 2 NICs. One WAN facing, the other LAN facing on their own local subnet 10.0.0.0/24. I can ping the other nodes on the local subnet no problems from the command line of each node. Node 1 = 10.0.0.1 Node 2 = 10.0.0.2 In the GUI...

this worked for me too. Thank you.

In all fairness, it doesnt **NEED** to be the same, but I wanted to understand if the VMBR was truly separate/ignorant of other VMBRs. I must admit that I'm coming from ESXi where we are using virtual pfSense FWs in front of their local networks, which carry VMs, and some local networks have the...

After configuring my 2 node cluster, I have a minor issue where node 2 does not show the full information in the storage summary tab for the nfsshare (please see screenshots), however node 1 is able to show this correctly. I can use the nfsshare on both nodes fine, but for some reason node 2...

Thanks for your help. So if I use NAT (which I'd like to do on each VMBR) does that still mean that I cannot use the same subnet ie. 192.168.1.0/24 on both VMBRs? What Im trying to achieve is essentially two distinct subnets with VMs/CTs in them NATted through to the internet via the physical...

My understanding is that a bridge is like a physical switch so if I had two switches (one for each LAN) but both going to the same physical NIC, however each LAN side of the bridge might have the same subnet. I think that the attached diagram should explain this. My concern was that the devices...

I had two separate nodes, node1 and node2. They each had their own storage which out of the box was "local" and "local-lvm" on both. Once I joined both nodes in a cluster these storage devices are displayed under both nodes, fair enough, however, under the datacentre->storage panel, "local" and...

If I create another bridge, would the VMs/CTs on different bridges be able to see each other if on the same subnet?