Search results

Hi, I have this current problem. I've experienced a disk failure in my ceph cluster with proxmox. I've replaced the disk, but now with the rebalancing / backfilling, one OSD crashes (osd.1). When I set the 'nobackfill' flag, the osd does not crash and does crash right after the flag is...

On proxmox 7.0-11, I've encountered this situation : I renamed the disk of a vm : "rbd -p ssdpool mv vm-120-disk-1 vm-120-disk-0" Then this does not reflect on the GUI (obviously as it does not know), and I cannot change this via the GUI : Is there a workaround ? Why I'm not able to select...

there are some rbd_data.5fb98cc6045b0e.000000000001d5c0 rbd_data.5fb98cc6045b0e.000000000000b509 rbd_data.5fb98cc6045b0e.0000000000004b7b rbd_data.5fb98cc6045b0e.000000000001b1fd rbd_data.5fb98cc6045b0e.0000000000015767 rbd_data.5fb98cc6045b0e.000000000000ff36...

Hi, Is there an easy way to setup ZFS dataset replication in Proxmox like in FreeNAS, or shall I find a 'by hand' solution ? Thanks !

Hi @aaron, sorry for the late reply, the cluster was down for electrical instabilities reasons. the remaining objects are stuff like : rbd_directory benchmark_data_proxmox1_3076_object142 benchmark_data_proxmox1_3076_object229 benchmark_data_proxmox1_1354523_object126...

it is also not possible to create a pool with the same name ... so how can we use the replication feature ?

Hi ! I moved all rbd from an initial to new pools, and now the initial pool (hddpool) still reports used space and objects ? Could someone tell me more ? root@proxmox5:~#ceph df POOL ID PGS STORED OBJECTS USED %USED MAX AVAIL hddpool 3 101 277 GiB...

ok this went fine after some time by itself .... Jun 24 11:37:13 proxmox5 ceph-osd[27428]: 2021-06-24T11:37:13.273+0200 7f6dac5cb700 -1 osd.1 0 failed to load OSD map for epoch 904831, got 0 bytes Jun 24 11:58:24 proxmox5 ceph-osd[27428]: 2021-06-24T11:58:24.741+0200 7f6db2214700 -1 osd.1...

same here

I could see previous posts about it https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/replication-with-different-target-storage-name.35458/#post-384533 https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/zfs-volume-naming-for-replication.90263/

I added a ZFS storage on another node (pool3), and I had a previous ZFS pool on the first node (pool2). I then wanted to configure replication of CT disk, but I had the error : 2021-06-24 12:02:03 104-0: (remote_prepare_local_job) storage 'pool2' is not available on node 'proxmox3' 2021-06-24...

I had latency issues with a 4TB disk, which I replaced with a 2TB disk. I used @alexskysilk procedure : https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/ceph-osd-disk-replacement.54591/ However, the new osd does not start : "osd.1 0 failed to load OSD map for epoch 904831, got 0 bytes" I've ceph 15.2.13 and...

Hello, While chcking for a SMART error, I could check this bug. When clicking in Disks / <the disk with SMART error>, the popup shows like below, and cannot be scrolled down to see the end of the ouput: Thanks !

I see, thanks sure, for example for the monitors https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/web-ui-cannot-create-ceph-monitor-when-multiple-pulbic-nets-are-defined.59059/#post-385762 I had to create osds also, which have the same issue, so I found this ceph-adm stuff. It also seems to be easier to...

yes, in order to add the ceph-adm tools on top of PVE. I've face some limitations on proxmox, and ended up on this website as given above. I saw this new tool, and before testing it, wanted to know.

I wanted to change to ceph-adm, as described here : https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/cephadm/adoption/#cephadm-adoption Is there any limitation ? Thanks!

I created a script for the workaround : https://github.com/kifeo/deploy-ceph-monitor

as for reference, I added it manually : https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/rados/operations/add-or-rm-mons/

Hello, I wanted also to create a monitor with the command 'pveceph mon create -mon-address 10.0.15.12' I still have the issue in 6.3-6 Error: any valid prefix is expected rather than "192.168.1.10/24, 10.0.10.0/24". command '/sbin/ip address show to '192.168.1.10/24, 10.0.10.0/24' up' failed...

not at all my last clue that was my setup was undersized. SSD i/o was too numberous generating more iowait and having snowball effect ... the main diff was the HDD was having less i/o due to the nature of the storage (it was due to store only less frequent accessible data). I shut down my...