Search results

  1. M

    [SOLVED] Dynamic action: possible?

    Dear Stoiko, thank you so much for your help! I decided to write a Python script with Proxmoxer to "automatically" create rules for every host. It won't be easy to manage but it's something. I'll be linking the script here once published on (our) git. Thank you again, Marco
  2. M

    ZFS replication network

    Hi everybody! I've read that bonding can only be active-passive on the cluster interface [1] but it's possible to set a separate network for migration [2]. Therefore, my question is: does this setting apply also to ZFS replication? Or is there anyway I can achieve that? I'll have many VMs...
  3. M

    [SOLVED] Dynamic action: possible?

    Hi Stoiko! Thank you for your reply. I need to setup a mail gateway to allow a certain amount of hosts in a LAN to send out mails and still pass SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks. Also, not all hosts in the LAN will be authorized to send mails and I want to keep some sort of traceability for the end user. I...
  4. M

    [SOLVED] Dynamic action: possible?

    Hi everybody, I'm trying to understand if it's possible in PMG to use a dynamic action. My goal is to replace the "From" header depending on the source IP address but in order to do it with standard PMG tools i would need to create one action, one who object and one rule for every IP address I...
  5. M

    Nodes interconnection via fiber optics

    Hi all, I have to admit, this is a weird question. I need to setup a new Proxmox cluster that, using ZFS, will be replicating VMs and CTs disks through different nodes. I know that quite a lot of bandwith might be required so I was checking out Mellanox with a 10Gbps SFP+. The problem is that...
  6. M

    PBS PVE Fail Backup

    Hi Fabian, yes, could say so, that those two VMs are especially active. One is Zabbix so data is continuously processed. The only other difference might be the size: those are the two largest VMs i have (600GB and 50GB of harddisks). Anyway, i waited 24h, ran the prune on the datastore...
  7. M

    PBS PVE Fail Backup

    Same problem here. Proxmox: proxmox-ve: 6.4-1 (running kernel: 5.4.114-1-pve) pve-manager: 6.4-8 (running version: 6.4-8/185e14db) pve-kernel-5.4: 6.4-2 pve-kernel-helper: 6.4-2 pve-kernel-5.4.114-1-pve: 5.4.114-1 pve-kernel-5.4.106-1-pve: 5.4.106-1 pve-kernel-5.4.103-1-pve: 5.4.103-1...
  8. M

    PVE API not outputting all what's in the task

    pt. 2 transferred: 14880498044 bytes remaining: 19693149828 bytes total: 34573647872 bytes progression: 43.04 % transferred: 15226234522 bytes remaining: 19347413350 bytes total: 34573647872 bytes progression: 44.04 % transferred: 15571971001 bytes remaining: 19001676871 bytes total...
  9. M

    PVE API not outputting all what's in the task

    What I see from the web console: () create full clone of drive scsi0 (hddpool:vm-17342006-cloudinit) transferred: 0 bytes remaining: 4194304 bytes total: 4194304 bytes progression: 0.00 % transferred: 2097152 bytes remaining: 2097152 bytes total: 4194304 bytes progression: 50.00 % transferred...
  10. M

    PVE API not outputting all what's in the task

    I'm working with Proxmox API and it seems like it won't output all what really was on stdout. API output: [{'t': 'create full clone of drive scsi0 (hddpool:vm-17342006-cloudinit)', 'n': 1}, {'n': 2, 't': 'transferred: 0 bytes remaining: 4194304 bytes total: 4194304 bytes progression: 0.00 %'}...

About

The Proxmox community has been around for many years and offers help and support for Proxmox VE, Proxmox Backup Server, and Proxmox Mail Gateway.
We think our community is one of the best thanks to people like you!

Get your subscription!

The Proxmox team works very hard to make sure you are running the best software and getting stable updates and security enhancements, as well as quick enterprise support. Tens of thousands of happy customers have a Proxmox subscription. Get yours easily in our online shop.

Buy now!