Search results

No, they are dedicated servers.

Now I have upgraded my second Proxmox VE server to kernel 2.6.32-3 (pve-kernel-2.6.32-3-pve). Regarding the load, it looks like kernel 2.6.32-1: pve-kernel-2.6.32-1-pve: 0.00 pve-kernel-2.6.32-2-pve: 0.50 pve-kernel-2.6.32-3-pve: 0.00 Kernel: pve-kernel-2.6.32-3-pve CPU: Intel Core i7-860 @...

Dietmar, My mistake, the load is as follow: pve-kernel-2.6.32-1-pve: 0.00 pve-kernel-2.6.32-2-pve: 0.50 pve-kernel-2.6.32-3-pve: 0.10 With pve-kernel-2.6.32-3-pve, it is almost again the same as pve-kernel-2.6.32-1-pve.

Sorry, please read: pve-kernel-2.6.32-1-pve: 0.00 pve-kernel-2.6.32-2-pve: 0.50 pve-kernel-2.6.32-3-pve: 0.10

Dietmar, I am using kernel 2.6.32-3-pve 64 bits (x86_64). To be honnest, I do not see any problem with 2.6.32-2-pve or 2.6.32-3-pve! It is just than the load average "seems" higher. I do not think there is a problem to use kernel 2.6.32-3-pve.

I just upgraded my Proxmox VE server to kernel 2.6.32-3 (pve-kernel-2.6.32-3-pve). Regarding the load, it looks better than kernel 2.6.32-2, but still not as kernel 2.6.32-1. pve-kernel-2.6.32-1-pve: 0.00 pve-kernel-2.6.32-2-pve: 0.50 pve-kernel-2.6.32-3-pve: 0.10