Search results for query: ZFS consumer SSD

Not what I am seeing in the real world. Let's start with a fresh VM where nothing is already backed up: zpool iostat poolBackup 1 capacity operations bandwidth pool alloc free read write read write ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----...

What features are you setting up on your hosts that are such great effort to deploy? Can you give specifics? My $.02, ymmv. As someone who recently migrated and expanded from a 3 node Vsphere cluster to 5 node Proxmox cluster and moved from Veeam to PBS. Changing my perspective on hosts made...

note that you can use HA with local zfs replicated between node. (but you can loss the last non synced datas snapshot). you could have better resilience than a single NAS (or do you have 2 truenas nodes with a shared array ?) About your truenas, what are the ssd model ? enterprise ssd wih...

Hi All, I'm experiencing the same problem but don't know if it's 9.1 related. I just made a test lab cluster with 6 x NUC. They are literally doing nothing, just idling. I wanted to test ZFS replication , so I have installed everything on a ZFS partition. Every nuc has the same hardware and the...

You are welcome: I noticed that I missed to link the thread where lnxbil described his way to use special_small_blocks, so I edited my post to link it: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/zfs-metadata-special-device.129031/post-699290 Please note that a dedicated OS mirror is helpful but not...

To be fair to Proxmox it is documented that cache=none does not fully disable write caching here. For that you need 'writethrough' or 'directsync', but expect absolutely horrific write performance on non enterprise SSDs and all spindles. https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Performance_Tweaks Expected...

Als (vorerst) letzten Versuch könntet (solltet) Ihr den p408i raushalten. Also kein logical Volume durch den Controller, sondern alle Disks direkt an PVE durchreichen. Dem hab ich hier anfangs nicht so die Bedeutung beigemessen, aber wir machen das bei unseren Umstellungen grundsätzlich so...

Single User Kram auf consumer drives - Glückwunsch, wenn es bei Dir läuft. Aber ein Terminalserver ist eine andere Liga als ein User, der ein bisschen surft oder einen Mailclient offen hat. Das sind komplett unterschiedliche Workloads. Und nein, der Punkt bezüglich consumer drives im...

Ja das ist uns bewusst, aber eben 0.1Mbit/s ist auch für eine WD Red massiv zu wenig. Wobei ja der Download der grossen Datei recht flott ging, da würde ich nicht von einem Performance Problem sprechen. Nein es ist kein ZFS im Spiel, das haben wir gewusst das dies keine schlaue Kombo ist.

Er schreibt was von LVM. Ich hab die SN700 und die gehen einwandfrei. Hab zwar keinen TS laufen aber 'n WS2K25 auf meinem PVE-NAS und es läuft Chrome mit xx Tabs und meist noch ein FF. Outlook auch. Und es gibt keine Spikes auf den virtuellen Disks. Ich hab allerdings kein LVM sondern ZFS. :)...

WD Red SSD, consumer drives im HW RAID1, da kann man nicht viel an Performance erwarten. Gerade bei virtualisierten Terminalservern mit multiplen User sessions. Ihr habt hoffentlich nicht noch ZFS auf das HW RAID gepackt? Wie sieht denn der I/O delay im PVE aus, wenn die Symptome auftreten?

Dear all, I am running PVE in a what i consider being a rather typical "IT nerd" setup, a 3-node-Cluster on consumer hardware. Private use only. 2 nodes are built identically: AMD 3200G (2C/4T) APU, 32GB DDR4 RAM, M2 NVMe for OS, 2x4TB HDD for storage (connected to SATA onboard), GbE NIC 1...

Fleecing on or off does not make a difference. There is no PBS instance involved. Storage is single NVME (2TB KIOXIA XG8 Series) with LVM volume. Graphs below definately show the issues, mouse cursor is at start of backup job. Memory usage is also pretty high: 87.23% (54.24 GiB of 62.18 GiB)

So..., with fleecing enabled everything is fine? Then leave it turned on and call it a day ;-) Some cheap consumer disks (SSD and NVMe) go easily into a "too slow"/"stuttering"/"high delay" mode. When such a device is really busy to supply the data to a backups job it may not be able to...

Hallo! Ich habe nun endlich etwas Zeit die INTEL SSDs einzusetzen. Die beiden sind jedoch kleiner als die drei Crucials, die aktuell in meinem System laufen. Wenn ich das jetzt nicht durcheinander bringe, dann laufen meine 3x 1TB Crucials als RAID-Z1 und ich möchte die beiden INTELs als RAID-Z0...

10year old ceph blog, also apply for zfs https://ceph.io/en/news/blog/2014/ceph-how-to-test-if-your-ssd-is-suitable-as-a-journal-device/ https://www.sebastien-han.fr/blog/2014/10/10/ceph-how-to-test-if-your-ssd-is-suitable-as-a-journal-device/ don't expect any good performance with consumer...

However, to be fair, I could imagine that there are probably significant differences between different consumer SSDs. So far, I’ve always used Samsung Evos (TLC) and, in one case, a Pro (MLC), and I haven’t managed to kill any of them yet, at least not with my workloads, even with ZFS. So I’d...

I'm not one of them :)

I think power-loss protection is somewhat overrated as well in a home lab, particularly if the budget is limited. With modern file systems, and modern branded SSDs it's not strictly necessary, provided you can accept the loss of any data that was "in flight" when the power went out. The file...

Watch out when doing PBS backups with that setting. If I remember correctly, PBS makes use of that. To get back to your initial question "How to reduce wear out" the correct answer IMHO would be: Don't worry! Others here recommended PLP drives, but in reality most workloads are perfectly fine...