Search results for query: QVO

...For the benefit of others running into the same issue, I'll paste the output here. with: sdc: root with ZFS on (slow) SSD (Samsung 860 QVO) sdb: LVM thin pool on 8 TB HDD (WDC WD80EDAZ) In addition to the graph and generated comment: the complete transaction took about 12 hours, during...

...stop since about 3- 6 months though. Hardware summary: AMD Ryzen 7 5700G with Radeon Graphics Asus ROG STRIX B550-I GAMING m2 NVME disk (no issues) SATA: 2x Samsung SSD 870 QVO 2TB I couldn't find a similar issue, but from what I read this is either a Virtualization issue or SATA Controller...

Good catch!! My brain stopped processing as soon as my eyes spotted the "870 QVO ssds", which happened before reading that 2x4tb per node o_O

Hello all i have a 3 node proxmox cluster with ceph. each node has 2x 4tb samsung 870 QVO ssds. I have noticed my vms being really slow and i was wondering how much of that is because of the ssds. I have checked my network and everything else. Im here to just confirm if what AI assistant is...

EVO or QVO? Please try the things here. Can you share cat /etc/pve/storage.cfg and pct config CTIDHERE of the CT with the now deleted snapshot? I'm curious what kind of storage type you used. How old was the snapshot?

...each to handle the 4 NVMe SSD drives. All of that is working perfectly! I see the 4 NVMe drives in the BIOS and I also have a 1TB Samsung 860 QVO SSD drive plugged into a SATA port. The Proxmox was installed on the Samsung drive. My plan was to use the 4 Sabrent Rocket drives for 8TB of...

All drives are the EVO variant as I know to stay away from the QVO ones. I will install PVE 8 and 9 on the same Gen10 hardware and compare between them, and I will also install PVE 9 on Gen9 hardware. Will post some conclusions here as soon as possible. Thank you

if these are Samsung QVO, they are not suitable at all. QLC drives write very slow after cache (which is different from DRAM cache). There is plenty topics on the forum about it, mainly with ZFS because it reveals faster the slowness.

...different groups of users to different pools should speed things up in general and minimize I/O contention. > The drives are Samsung 870 QVO (which are desktop) Search the forums for QLC / quad-level cell, there are horror stories and multiple recommendations to stay away from them. ESXI...

...mightn't that just spare the users in group 2 and 3 from the disruption if I did a restore of something in group 1? The drives are Samsung 870 QVO (which are desktop), but these boxes (and a several more, including servers) were on ESXi6 until a week ago and worked fine. Why would Proxmox...

...should update all Dell firmware to the newest (or are there known version issues with Proxmox)? The big drives are desktop I think, Samsung 870 QVO (560/530 MB/s). (The 2 500GB for the OS are Samsung 870 EVO with similar read/writes.). (My ESXi box uses the same Samsung 870 QVO drives in...

...threads) with 64 GB DDR4 Crucial 3200 MHz RAM. For storage I currently use: NVMe Crucial P5 Plus 2 TB (ZFS, small/light VMs) SATA Samsung 860 QVO 1 TB (main VMs) USB 1 TB drive (used for occasional backups) After some months of usage, I’ve realized the Crucial P5 Plus NVMe is not reliable...

...TYPE HCTL SIZE MODEL SERIAL sda sda disk 0:0:1:0 3.6T Samsung SSD 870 QVO 4TB S5VYNJ0R605400B └─ceph--73399c9e--de85--429c--b0c2--9018391757be-osd--block--db796d42--d751--4c09--a4f5--ad92a2285eaf...

...uid=0, gid=6, mode=0660 Mar 02 19:32:07 pve (udev-worker)[818]: sda1: Successfully created symlink '/dev/disk/by-id/ata-Samsung_SSD_870_QVO_8TB_S5SSNF0W712801K-part1' to '/dev/sda1' Mar 02 19:32:07 pve (udev-worker)[818]: sda1: Successfully created symlink '/dev/disk/by-label/8TB' to...

Danke für den Hinweis. Wusste ich nicht, werde mich aber mal dazu einlesen. Die Performance ist mir hier nicht so wichtig, das ist ja nur der PBS der nachts die Backups fährt. Im Idealfall muss man die ja auch nicht zurückspielen und sonst dauert es halt ein bisschen länger.

...Namen "sdc" kennt - d.h. du musst dann zpool replace -f EXT-PBS-[..] sdc ata-Samsung_SSD_[..] ausführen. Und weil es zufällig sehe - speziell QVO SSDs sind für ZFS ziemlich ungeeignet, vor allem wenn man irgendeine Erwartung an Performance hat. Nul als Vorwarnung - findet man sehr viel...

...14500T RAM: 64GB ram Chassi: Fractal node 804 Disks: 2xWD RED 2TB NVME - Part1-Proxmox ZFS Mirror, Part2-VM/CT. ZFS Mirror on Luks 3xSamsung QVO 8TB SSD - Media and other "WORM" content. ZFS RAIDZ1 on Luks PVE2: Terramaster F4-424 Pro CPU: Intel N305 Ram: 32GB Disks: 1xWD RED 2TB NVME -...

Am einfachsten ist bei den langsamen Dingern ein Backup zu machen und dann Restore auf vernünftige SSDs. QLC SSDs und ZFS ist das tödlichste was du tun kannst. Da schreibt ein USB Stick schneller. Ein Backup, also rein read sollte vernünftig funktionieren.

Moin, Habe ein ZFS raid 10 mit 8x Samsung 870 QVO SATA SSD's. Diese Bremsen das System soweit aus I/O, Server load, dass der HA Cluster die Migration ausgeführt hat. Aktuell habe ich auf der Node nur ein paar LXC's und würde die Platten gerne durch bessere ersetzen. Wie wäre die...

Also zfs und QVO ist überhaupt keine gute Kombination, da ist I/O Delay bzw. Wait vorprogrammiert.