Search results

What shouldn't be what way? Don't know what you mean by that. What I stated is how the kernel has always worked and it is why having multiple IP's on the same subnet can result in confusing behavior. The other thing, of course, is that the PVE gui may bind to specific interfaces on startup...

Both bridges are in the same network, so the kernel will pick one at random for reply packets. Remove the IP from the "slow" one and it should use the "fast" one.

Backup jobs sort of "pre-start" the VM (I forget why), so if the VM has a pass-thru device that is also passed to another VM that is running you will see this problem.

You are setting up a very complex scenario. I don't have time this morning to walk you through all the complexities of what you are trying to do with regard to the dual ISP setup. It is called "multi-homing" and you can look it up. That is not a trivial thing to get working and depending on what...

Did you set a DNS when you configured the VM? If it gets an IP via DHCP, make sure the DHCP server is sending the DNS option. The settings on your PVE host are not relevant to the VM.

This is kind of a mess. You should not have gateways specified for all the bridges, and you should not have a gateway that's on a different network than the bridge, and you should not have the same /24 on multiple interfaces unless they really are connected to the same network (and even that is...

Again, I advise to read the manual. You have what's called an LVM-thin setup. The installer set up the Logical Volume Manager, which is different from traditional partitions. It manages a chunk of disk space by carving it up into virtual block devices "on demand". When you make a VM a virtual...

That isn't what you want to do. You see that 1.7 TB "pve-data" thingy? That should show up in the gui as "local-lvm" or similar. That is where your VMs will go. Just set that as the storage when you create a VM. Then read the storage section of the manual.

I don't run a cluster but AFAIK the storages don't have to be the same size on all nodes for migration to work. You just need to have sufficient space on the target.

Why did you bring it up then? As far as I know the GUI only supports creating an LVM-thin on a whole disk. It isn't exactly an enterprise use-case to have other things on the same disk as your VM's, while it is one to have entire disks dedicated to VM storage. That being said, it can be done...

So do that and use Hyper-V as the hypervisor.

In that case you might be better served by a desktop virtualization solution: virt-manager, vmware, virtualbox. PVE is pitched as an enterprise solution and that comes with certain expectations of the users. Those other solutions claim to be easy for beginners. You are free to use it whatever...

One way is to "apt install bsd-mailx". Then your command becomes echo "whatever" | mail me@email.com... Or something like that.

Googling suggests that this is a feature Google wanted for Chromebooks. https://www.phoronix.com/news/AMDGPU-Secure-Display-Patches

The error I get is below. I run PVE 9 with kernel 6.14.11-3. : amdgpu 0000:c2:00.0: amdgpu: RAS: optional ras ta ucode is not available : amdgpu 0000:c2:00.0: amdgpu: RAP: optional rap ta ucode is not available : amdgpu 0000:c2:00.0: amdgpu: SECUREDISPLAY: securedisplay ta ucode is not...

I think pve-firmware package has the amdgpu firmware. Apparently you already have that? Maybe someone will know more if you tell us what GPU you have. I get an error about not having secure display microcode, but everything seems to work (and it is a different error from yours). My machine is a...

I got my FW desktop. PVE 9.0 runs fine on it. No issues so far. The GPU works with virtio-gl, which gives decent desktop performance for my usage. It replaces a Xeon D-1541 that was getting old. Relative to that it is very fast and has twice the core count with similar idle power. Passing the...

Also, the reason I asked how @powersupport how he was checking the time in the VM is because on Linux each user can have their own locale settings. The timedatectl settings only apply to root and as a default for other users. So it is entirely possible for different users to have different...

How are you reading "VM local time"? Do you log in to a shell, do you send a command to the agent, something else? About 99% of the time when there is a time discrepancy of an exact number of hours or half-hours and NTP is synchronized, it is a time zone problem. The uptime can obviously be...

By having them on the same subnet you are telling the kernel routing that it doesn't matter which one it uses because they are all the same. If they aren't actually the same, then you will see what you are seeing. Kernel picks one arbitrarily, because you told it that it doesn't matter.