Search results

problem fixed in 4.2-17 Thanks :)

enhancement filed at : https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048 thanks :)

Hi, I'm setting up an hook script for vzdump with a mailnotification enabled. I don't get the the same messages on the console and on the e-mail. That's a problem because all the job-start messages are missing (lines : INFO: HOOK: start job-start INFO: HOOK-ENV...

I indeed agree with "The biggest risk is having the entire array get corrupted, not just one VM." But is this risk real? Anybody else to enlight us?

Thanks for your answer. But I can't proceed the way you propose (I first need to test the servers on 2.1...) and backup/restore would take too much time = downtime... I wanted both version to access the same array, but of course not use the same VM (and the same LV) at the same time I would...

Thanks Tom for your answers. 1) I'll check 2) When you tell me to be careful, you mean to be careful not to start the same machine twice, right? I manage few VM's (20), and I'll manually move the conf file of each machine (after having stopped it), so there should be no problem. I was afraid...

Hi, I'm working on a migration from 1.7 to 2.1. I'm really impressed by the improvements I can see between the 2 versions!!! great job guyz! I've got several questions : 1) I've mapped my old NFS storage used to host my .iso files. It connects on 2.1, I can see the space allocated and so on...

I've migrated my VM from Xen(source) to KVM. The kernel was specific so there was a need of some precautions : http://forum.proxmox.com/threads/391-Migration-of-servers-to-Proxmox-VE?p=21252#post21252 if you use a full virtualized VM (without specific kernel) : * create a VM via Proxmox with...

Ok so i'll manage to do it manually before removing the VM and I'll join the list;) Thanks :)

Hi everybody ;) I got a performance and disk space problem on my SAN (Datacore San Melody) due to the fact I've created/deleted too many VM's on the iSCSI LVM. Datacore suggests us to zero disks before doing lvremove to tell the SAN the space is really available and to allow San Melody to...

You must use multipath to allow your cluster to connect via several paths to the iscsi target : http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/ISCSI_Multipath

Don't forget that in such case it is impossible to share it between different servers...the filesystem wouldn't appreciate... :)

I believe there should be a way to do that : look at http://www.open-iscsi.org/docs/README 5.1 How to setup iSCSI interfaces (iface) for binding ?

you're right thanks for the precision ;)

seems to be due to the writing cache on the iSCSi target with cache : mwhinpo:/home/whinpo# dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/arf/bigfile bs=1024k count=1000 1000+0 records in 1000+0 records out 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 3.22445 s, 325 MB/s mwhinpo:/home/whinpo# without cache...

isn't it the same problem as I got in : http://forum.proxmox.com/threads/5735-Writing-in-a-Linux-VM-is-slow-(storage-iSCSI-LVM) ?

I agree SSH could be slow, that's why i did dd for my tests to note down the speed... that's direct and that should be fast...

Hi, I've noticed that scp a file between 2 linux VM didn't go faster than 100Mbits/s. I've checked my network, my cards...but everything was fine.. I've tested on 2 VM on the same node : same speed... then I decided to dd directly on the disk of a Linux VM... and the speed is...

just had the same problem today... trying to restart my brand new VM hosting the NFS backup.. the GUI was frozen, no way to do qm list, or list /mnt/pve... the VM were running without issue btw.. the only way i found was to modify the storage.cfg on one node where nothing was running...

i don't understand why you put twice Dell in the multipath.conf...? I think it should be here only once... if you look at the doc I've put in the wiki, you'll see what I got in my multipath.conf for a Datacore system... http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/ISCSI_Multipath stop multipath, remove one...