Search results

Hi, after Upgrade to 6.4.13 on a 3-node cluster I get a health warning: Module 'volumes' has failed dependency: /lib/python3/dist-packages/cephfs.cpython-37m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so: undefined symbol: ceph_abort_conn What am I missing? I have already checked, that python-cephfs as well as...

Hi,thanks for clearing that up. May I ask, why is ZFS the limitation? Isn't there an other way to sync online? Like creating a vm snapshot as one does it during backup? One could even dirty bitmaps-feature as used with PBS but instead of adding chunks, updating a vm disk... Maybe PBS could...

Hi, thank you for the hint with pve-zsync: I tried that today, non successful: pve-zsync sync --source 120 --dest 192.168.10.71:120 --Verbose --maxsnap 2 --limit 512 ERROR Message: ERROR: in path The source VM lies on a ceph storage, the destination storage is a "normal" path. What I was not...

Good Morning everyone! I would like to use the VM replication feature. The replication target node is within a LAN-Segment, that is connected via a Outdoor-WIFI P2P Link only. Although the average throughput of that link is about 30 MB/s, I consider it as "unstable" as the link is, for one used...

I know, but for the sake of the product, one has to test it! And what better way to test it from the prospective, as if it would be already enterprise-ready... then one can say, what's still missing!

What is the estimated time-span from the testing to the "production" repo? Related question: Do you rely on /etc/stinit.def to initialize the tape-drive correctly or do you use an pbs internal way to initialize the drive?

It's all good! I understood! I'm working long enough in that business! I have some super-duper Samsung Enterprise-Class 4TB SSDs as spares for my ceph around, which I want to "abuse" to test the difference, but that will take some time! As I migrated from vsphere+ veeam, I thought about a lot...

this is rather cynic, isn't it? And will not help to address the actual problem nor improve the product, but well... sometimes cynicism is the only way to cope on things, you cannot change anyway!

Where do you want me to change the chunk-size? Veeam or in PBS? I have no idea, where to change it in either product. regards, Felix

Ok. I take that as it is - I'm used to work with what I have, and thats a HDD-RAID, that will read with DD up to 300MB/s which is, from my point of view, good enough at that point. Though I can considere about SSDs. My thinking is like this: If I can write a big (1TB) file from the same...

Hi Thomas! Okay, what are the problems: First, I think, that swapping a well and fast working HDD RAID with SSDs is not a solution but a workaround. Secondly I think, to mitigate the seek-operations while I/O, one could simply create a file-system in a top-level container what ever sort of...

could you compile the patch for me, so I can try it right a way?

I'm coming from vSphere + Veeam B&R. PVE is working like a charm as does BPS. So far I can see 2 general disadvantages which I want to address in the hope, they can be fixed in near future: as I migrated the vSphere 1:1 to PVE, and use the dirty-bitmap feature +dedupe of PBS, I would have...

No doubt! my tapedrive... I'm also chatty! I'll wait for the patch.

Ok, I just realized, the above sg_raw.out.gz was made without tape loaded. So attached to this post is now the sg_raw output with tape loaded.

Good Morning, sorry for the delay, an other backup was in progress. Attached are the screenshot from the task as well as the output from sg_raw. regards, Felix

Hi, I want to try out the new tech-preview on the PBS Tapebackup - so far I did not come very far, as I get the above message, when I try to label a tape. This is my tapedrive (tapeinfo -f /dev/st0): Product Type: Tape Drive Vendor ID: 'IBM ' Product ID: 'ULTRIUM-HH7 ' Revision: 'G9Q1'...

Any news, when this patch now will be available for the current branches? It would be unfortunate, If I upgrade from 5.3.9 (for which you sent me the patch) to 5.4 and the VMs would crash again! regards, Felix

Hi Good Morning, Sorry, I couldn't get back any sooner. Yes, so far there have not been any issues anymore and the system has been undergoing an extreme phase of login/logoffs as well as local console administration to ensure stability on the admin side too. On my opinion, your patch solved the...

I have applied the patch. Prior to that patch, the system would crash approximately every 2 days, however it also run up to 11 days without incident, depending on how many logins where. So I have to wait a while (up to 2 weeks of usage) until it's safe to say, that this patch fixed the problem...