Search results

started an extra thread for my problem :) pls delete this post

that would be real great! (better would be additionaly the vm-name in the backup-file-name) :)

thx i still don't get it why somebody complains about a standard-port used for the "WEB-ui", but ok, maybe i don't see the big picture :)

"pseudo" security? ;)

thanks i will use this in future cases of such problems in the meantime i found another solution i had to create a virtual drive in the java remote console for the blade and with that mounted the installation found the virtual drive after loosing the hardware-drive and everything went fine

i get this error with firefox: ssl_error_rx_record_too_long single machine, no cluster etc. is there a reason why you use now 8006 and not 443 anymore?

k, thanks, than i will stay at kvm, just thought that openvz would be nicer over all :)

Hi, at the moment i try to install the new pve 2.0 on one blade of a ibm blade center (H Chassis) but the installation isn't working cause of this error. Have you any clue how i could get rid of this? one and a half year ago i reported this error with the change from 1.5 to 1.6 but...

hi is there a chance that this will work with pve 2.0? thanks

has thus been changed? I would like to switch from kvm to openvz but i need a veth (because the mailgateway must be in a specific dmz e.g. vmbr2) tia

hi vm 201 was just an example, it can happen with everyone on the host i have the size set to 4000 cause that was the maximum that was possible, e.g. 4096 was already too much BUT maybe i found the real issue for this problem. my nexentacore nas with napp-it on top just informed me about an...

"nice" to hear (i hope you unterstand how i mean that), how have you distributed the vCPUs? All 4 as Socket, or 1 Socket und 4 Cores, or maybe 2 Sockets und 2 Cores and so on. in the mailgateway i have 2 Sockets with each 1 core. in 2008r2 i had the problem with 1 socket and 2 cores, 2 sockets...

i would love to find the issue, same as with the 2.6.32-6 kernel problem i had/have. but the problem is that next week i'm on vacation and i don't like to go with bellyache ;) the strange thing is that the next try i started went through without any problems Sep 23 09:02:01 INFO: Starting...

Hi, is it possible to switch back to an old vzdump-version? the actual vzdump (1.2-15) which came with 1.9 drives me crazy. when the backup starts i can see the rise of the .dat file, e.g. 12GB in 5 minutes and then happens nothing (12gb is the size of the vm, so it would be finished from the...

ok thx, and its definitely possible to get back to 2.6.32-4?

the mailgateway host is a Dell R310, the host of the 2008r2sp1 servers is a r715 the bluescreen of the 2k8 server says "A clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor within the allocated time interval." and yes sure, i can test it in the next days on the R310 with the mailgateways...

today i had the chance to test it again with 2.6.32-6 and unfortunately it failed again after a few minutes the mailgateway stops working and won't react to anything on the host it looks like this now i'm back on 2.6.32-4 again, and also on my two other machines cause it seems like 2.6.32-6...

short update: the restore on another machine showed no problem, with the difference that the mailgateway was not productive and not in the same DMZ as normal i'm going to try the -6 kernel again on the productive machine but it will need a few days until i have the chance und the time to do this...

it's a Dell PowerEdge R310 Xeon X3440, 8GB RAM, 2x250GB SATA 7k2rpm, SAS 6iR - Raid 1 3x VMs running on it pve-manager/1.9/6542 atm Linux 2.6.32-4-pve #1 SMP Mon May 9 12:59:57 CEST 2011 proxmox-mailgateway/2.6/4540 Linux 2.6.27-2-proxmox as it comes out of the box (a 3-domain-license...

hi i think i'm the victim of some sort of bug with the new kernel-version 2.6.32-6. if u use the free proxmox mailgateway version in a kvm-host with pve kernel version 2.6.32-6 the host hangs up on start. some times the boot is successful but after a few minutes the mailgateway hangs up with...