Search results

Hi, here is a good documentation over DEP (Data Execution Prevention) and to disable it for applications. Docu is only in german.

hi dietmar, thanx for answer. I didn´t understand why it works under Proxmox 1.x and not under Proxmox 2.x. Can you explain me why? Sorry for stupid questions ;-)

will this fixed, or is this a limitation?

solved: hdd was full :(

Hi, every time, i upload an iso image to the local template dir over the web gui, the iso has zero byte. Valle

Hello, if i try to assign more then 5 interfaces then the web gui shows me an error: parameter verification failed. With proxmox 1.x there was no problem. As workaround i have changed the qemu.conf under the console. Valle.

Hi Tom, thanx for the answer. I have tried a lot to finde the reason. The problem must in the kernel over 2.6.18. The software for the dongle isn´t compatible with kernel over 2.6.18. I have tried different cpu mode, os modes, software compatiblity mode. Do you have any hint, that i can try...

Hi Proxmox Staff, is there a chance to get an 2.6.18 Kernel for the 2.1 Proxmox release? Why?! Because i have an older VM Machine, that use a Sentinel SuperPro Dongle. The Software, that needs the dongle, didn´t find the dongle and works only with the 2.6.18 kernel but not with newer kernels...

Re: New Proxmox VE Kernels 2.6.24 and 2.6.32, including KVM 0.12.3 and gPXE network b Hi udo, thanx for answer. I use the usbanywhere under windows xp .. I use a special software that needs a dongle. Do you use any special drivers for the usbanywhere?

Re: New Proxmox VE Kernels 2.6.24 and 2.6.32, including KVM 0.12.3 and gPXE network b Hi all, problem still exist with the latest Kernel 2.6.32 and 2.6.35. With latest 2.6.18-6 all works fine. Any hints? Regards, Valle

Hi, now the virtio drivers are offical portet to freebsd http://www.freshports.org/emulators/virtio-kmod/ valle

deletet sorry, wrong forum.

Hi Pitt, thanx for the example. Yesterday i have created a rule ebtables -A FORWARD -d ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff/ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff -p IPv4 --ip-prot udp --ip-dport 67:68 -j ACCEPT and for each interface: ebtables -A FORWARD --in-if bond0.111 ! --out-if tap200i1000d0 -j DROP Look like, that this...

Hi Pitt, i have now tried with iptables. I have one bridge only for the AP traffic. All traffic between the host are successful blocked. But i have the problem, that the hosts and the mac are visible for each other. ebtables filter layer 2 traffic. Do you have an example for me, how block the...

Hi pitt, thanx for answer. Today i have solved the problem with iptables. have created the follow rule for each interface: -A interface-check -m physdev -j DROP --physdev-in bond0.111 ! --physdev-out tap200i1000d0 Till now it look good. Deeper tests i can make monday. Or do you have a...

Hi Dietmar, thanx for answer. But i cant assign more than 20(?) bridges to a kvm, or? There are no other way? I tried it with iptable rules .. but till now, i have no success. I have tried it and there comes a pci error. Regards, Valle.

Hello, i have a big problem with our configuration. I hope the community can help me. We have 45 AccessPoints installed in our hospital for our patient. The goal is to route the devices from the patient direct to the internet. On the network are no critical datas ;-) This year, there is no...

i will try it at the weekend and post the results. on your postet link, there are the different modes are declared: rp_filter - INTEGER 0 - No source validation. 1 - Strict mode as defined in RFC3704 Strict Reverse Path Each incoming packet is tested against the...

Yes, of course. Can you Tell me, for what the parameter is? It works, but i dont know for what it is good. link

Hi Dietmar, i have solved the Problem. Reading in the openvz forum gives me the right sign ;-) Added to /etc/sysctl.d/vzctl.conf the parameter net.ipv4.conf.all.rp_filter = 0 net.ipv4.conf.default.rp_filter = 0