Search results

no...it's not the system disk! I just recreate the partition ;) I still investigate!

A NTFS partition was already created (as /dev/sda1); now I delete her and recreate a blank partition. But still not see the disk. I try with Windows 2003...

yes. twice. I reboot also the PVE server... The config is: name: WEB-SERVER ide2: local:iso/Windows7Professional.iso,media=cdrom vlan0: e1000=86:FB:1E:7C:7E:E8 bootdisk: ide0 ostype: w2k8 ide0: /dev/sda1 memory: 2048 sockets: 1 onboot: 0 cores: 1 boot: dc freeze: 0 cpuunits: 1000 acpi: 1 kvm...

Yes...I intend to give access to all disk...including MBR (if is possible)

Hi All, Ai try to create a VM with access to a real Hard Disk. So, I create the VM and after that I change the configuration after I add: qm set 107 --ide0 /dev/sda1 sda1 - is the new empty hard disk I boot from a Windows7 iso, but the system don't see my disk. What I need to do?

How much cache do you have on RAID card? Write cache it's enable on controller?

no...I'm not using RAID. The system it's installed on a Gigabyte EX38-DS5 with Q6600 on a 640GB S-ATA 7200RPM. The S-ATA is configure as AHCI. So...no RAID defined.

I receive initramfs error. I try to type lvm lvchange -ay pve but I receive error. Normal, from what I read, a sollution was update-initramfs -u...but I can't run this. I'm a little bit without knowledge for this kind of error. What can I do using the CD?

I'm not sure why but the PVE env 1.5 refuse to boot because he can't mount /dev/pve-root; I try to mount also the disk in Fedora: the /pve/data I mount Ok and copy all VM Images but /pve/root can't be mounted. How can I recover the installation? Can I repair this system from CD? I wait...

I test more then 10 configurations (3 servers) and I realize that: If someone want to configure a low cost server with normal configuration (used with maximum 5 VM) can use one 7200 rpm server with 64MB cache. I obtain on this test FSYNCS/SECOND >1000 even when the VM was started. In this case...

Maybe an automatic failover will be availabe in the near future. There are more important task to solve until then. But, if you have a good server (RAID10 or 5 with battery backup) you will not have problems. To syncronise some servers between different locations...try to solve the problems...

PVE cluster will not create Failover environment. For this you will need to create your own failover env. If you intend to have 2 PVE servers with identical VM, and to switch between them...sorry, but PVE will not do that for you (not now) But, if you want to have 2 Win 2003 server VM and to...

I never configure RAID 1...I use on fisrt test a single disk - no raid. I check again the BIOS settings...

Regarding to this post: http://www.proxmox.com/forum/showthread.php?p=16796#poststop I make some tests to see if I can measure the PVE performance on RAID 0 and RAID 10 using onbord RAID controllers. To be onest, I'm not familiar (too much) with this controllers; but, I have this platform...

in this moment work slow...as an USB1.1 The stick is USB2.0.

Hi All, I just connect a USB memory stick 16GB and I attached to a virtual XP and the device is recognized as USB1.1 device. Why? The server host have USB2.0 ports... I reboot the XP machine, but the same... Anyone know the reason?

I just compare some values: 1) RAID configuration: FSYNCS/SECOND: >3000 2) STANDARD S-ATA (7200 rpm disk): FSYNCS/SECOND: 100-200 3) SAS 15k (no raid): FSYNCS/SECOND: max 300. So the disk performance is connected to the RAID CARD. Without this, the PVE performance is LOW. Please post more...

can you tell us what RAID card do you use?

Hi All, I intend to create a tutorial and explain how to create a correct PVE server and for this I need to know how to measure PVE parameters; what are the benchmark commands? If is possible to receive some values (let say "normal working" values) to try to see where we need to concentrate...

I will send you also the last syslog...last 24h The strange part is that since yesterday I receive few messages from root...that can't be delivered. The machine is intact! we will analyze what happen next year ;) This is also the first time when a OpenVZ machine broke...without a logic...