Hello JBB,
As far as I understood, probably yes. Here is my understanding of your configuration:
The host configuration will look like:
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
iface eth0 inet manual
auto vmbr0
iface vmbr0 inet static
address xx.xx.40.157
netmask 255.255.255.0...
Hello jherazob
My understanding I collected in a short diagram you find as attachment - please verify if it´s correct.
Assuming "yes":
So, in order to not mix it up, I defined an "outside 0" for the Proxmox´s "Own LAN" and "outside1,2,3" for the 3 extra VLANs. From the above I understood...
Hello jherazob,
difficult to say without having more details.
Could be considered better when available:
- your LAN requirements in detail (which VMs resp. containers should use and reach which addresses)
- the (current) /etc/network/interfaces from the host
- the (current) configuration...
Hello proxmox_user
Yes, don´t use the ovs-vsctl commands for configuring but always the web portal or the related advices in /etc/network/interfaces.
Depends what you need in particular. I don´t know a tutorial, but look here...
Hello MArco
No! Recently I made 10 (linked) clones from a debian using (same) LVMs. Works fine. The only one thing I had to adapt (but it´s neither a problem for/frompve nor related to LVM) was the certificate for ssl, because other connected machines in the networked complained that they used...
Hello curlingcanteen
vente0 is a virtual NIC which is accessible from both host nd all containers on it.
If it can be used only for internal (= host to Container and back) or for external (where host is physically conected to) connection too depends on the assigned addresses.
Examples...
Hello mztriz
Sorry, I made a small mistake in my previous post: if you separate wlan0 and bridge the bridge must have a different IP (Why? they are in different LANs now: one is the wlan with the default router somewhere to internet, the other your local to the VMs, which is just a virtual...
Hello vinc,
You can have only one default gateway - if you want it to put it to vmbr2 delete first from vmbr1.
You can name it as you like - also "xyz1" or "krixkrax", also "eth1" of course.
No relation to any other NIC in any other VM /CT or host.
Kind regards
Mr.Holmes
Hello milkymouse,
It´s just a change in terminology: Backups = VZDump backup file
Can be used for both KVMs and CTs - "vzdump" is the name of the backup-program which is the same for both types.
Kind regards
Mr.Holmes
Hello milkymouse,
Cannot imagine, I use currently 3.3-7:
Yes, on command line; if you e.g. want to backupo VM 199 to directory /home/mydir/dumps it looks like:
vzdump -dumpdir /home/mydir/dumps 199
Kind regards
Mr.Holmes
Hello offerlam
Have a look at the end of the following part of your error message
kvm: -drive file=/mnt/pve/Storage01_Vms/images/116/vm-116-disk-1.qcow2,if=none,id=drive-virtio0,format=qcow2,aio=native,cache=none: could not open disk image...
Hello mztriz
Regarding wlan in general: I know from my experience that wireless is always problematic in any kind of bridges - from which type ever (LINUX, OVS, VMware, VBox,...). Therefore I avoid them categorically. Even I don´t know if and how it may work in your case. Have a look here...
Hello vinc
In the GUI
Yes - note: if you have only containers with direct IP address you don´t need vmbr2; but I prefer also for containers use bridged virtual NICs (veth) - with venet0 sometimes unexpected effects occur.
Success!
Mr.Holmes
Hello offerlam,
What I would do:
1. Check if cluster communication works well (by "clustat", "pvecm status" and "pvecm nodes")
2. Figure out where the VMs are really located currently, e.g. by
ls /etc/pve/nodes/*/qemu-server/
and
qm list
at all nodes.
3. Check if the assigned...
Hello rumix,
Quite understandable.
"should" - but the OpenVZ developers implemented like this. If you think it is a bug report it here: https://bugzilla.openvz.org/
Honestly, I am not optimistic that it will succeed....
On the other hand: to make your own start script containing both...
Hello vinc
Not quite clear how Proxmox host is connected to the router - I conclude via eth0 and an address in 10.147.42.0/24
Then the answer will be: NO - there is an overlapping between 10.147.42.0/24 and 10.147.42.192/26
Why not make a simple change from 42 to e.g. 43, like this:
#...
I would not use NFS - it´s designed for LANs but not for WANs; sshfs would be a good choice (but also smb / cifs would work). In Proxmox it´s seen then simply as "Directory" storage. The topic with firewall will not be so complicate - access to port 22 (or any other, it´s configurable) to the...
Hello rumix,
No, works fine - your problem seems to be a different one
Because you have a problem with your storage:
/mnt/r1/prrivate/103 - probably the location of your container - is currently not availabe
Container start fails immediately, i.e. before there is any opportunity to...