Search results

Try to look into the wiki: https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Zram ;-) Edit: that page seems to over-complicating things. For me the single command apt install zram-tools was sufficient. That gave me: ~# zramctl NAME ALGORITHM DISKSIZE DATA COMPR TOTAL STREAMS MOUNTPOINT /dev/zram0 lz4...

Well..., yes. Since August: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/proxmox-virtual-environment-9-0-released.169257/#post-788520 ;-) And first upgrade in November: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/proxmox-virtual-environment-9-1-available.176254/ Have fun :-)

I was talking about upgrading to Trixie, if you really want to get the new apt binary - which is a weak reason, there are much better ones. In case of PVE this is the guide to follow: https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Upgrade_from_8_to_9

PBS braucht IOPS. Die Bandbreite ist fast egal, weil die Latenz alles kaputt macht. "Time per request: 1702951 microseconds." + "Uploaded 104 chunks in 177 seconds.". Also nullkommasechs IOPS... Disclaimer: ich habe das noch nie so aufgebaut.

It does not need to be a separate server. But it is recommended. I want my PBS to be available/usable when my PVE dies completely. You know the 3-2-1 rule? Three backups on two different media, one off-site. When you build one PBS there is no redundancy per se. There are at least two levels: I...

(( This thread is four years old and it usually is recommended to open new threads after such a long time - and possibly link back to the old problem. )) Meanwhile it is 2026 and PDM https://pdm.proxmox.com/docs/ is released stable 1.0 -->...

Is this a bot??? (First post and an unreadable wall-of-text...)

Jan 22 20:23:18 pve login[22321]: pam_unix(login:session): session closed for user root Jan 22 20:23:18 pve pvedaemon[1082]: <root@pam> end task UPID:pve:0000571A:0004ED89:697277C1:vncshell::root@pam: OK Jan 22 20:23:18 pve systemd[1]: session-78.scope: Deactivated successfully. Jan 22 20:23:18...

It can. But that's not the goal here. If you want to run VMs there it needs to be part of the cluster. Then the whole connectivity - including all VLANs/Subnets - needs to be available with low latency, right? For PVE Quorum, which has nothing to do with Ceph: if you just put a Quorum Device on...

Für den Server ist das nicht vorgesehen. Für die (VM-) Gäste gibt PVE da nix vor und schränkt auch nichts ein. (Zumindest bei Nichtverwendung des SDN.) Sorry, da habe ich keine spezifische Empfehlung. Für PVE könnte einiges im Wiki (https://pve.proxmox.com/) stehen und für Debian im allgemeinen...

Das kann nach zwei Sätzen allgemeiner Beschreibung wirklich niemand sagen... Die Bridge hat eine physische Schnittstelle, die mit deinem "normalen" Netz verbunden ist? Und es gibt einen DHCP Server in dem Netz? Dann sollte die IP Adressvergabe wie erwartet funktionieren. Um das genauer...

Nicht dass ich wüsste. (Was nix bedeuten muss...) Mit Hilfe der Dirty-Bitmap müsste der Umfang der Änderungen eigentlich einfach (und technisch billig) zu ermitteln sein. Mach mal einen Feature Request auf https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=pbs ;-)

Did you take a look into the journal? No hints? journalctl -b -1 -e = show the end (-e) of the previous (-1) boot. "-2" for the one before the last one and so on. man journalctl tells you more. If there is no sign of the shutdown sequence then it may be a hardware problem...

Yes, thank you! For #9 too. Actually I have never used Discord, so this gave me some insight. :-)

Please excuse my massive ignorance: why would one go and use some random Discord server when there is this open forum? (No, I won't go and test it...)

This! When you have more than a single digit devices you want to have some single source of truth, resulting in johndoe being the same johndoe on all systems. There is a multitude of solutions for this. Each and every one needs some attention, experience and maintenance. My personal choice is...

There is no dedicated "master" as all nodes are equal. (When you look under "Datacenter --> HA Status" you can notice that the shown "master" node will vary, depending on the current availability.) Shared storage must be reachable/usable on each and every node¹. Every node uses its own IP...

Just use a simple USB-NIC for that second ring. This (personal view: USB-devices in general) is usually not recommended, but a second ring using sub-optimal devices is probably better than none. Of course both connections should (hopefully) be stable under all circumstances; to check the...

I won't fight this. This discussion is interesting, though I did not verify their statements: https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs/issues/760

PBS 4 is on Trixie / Debian 13 PVE 8.4 is Bookworm / Debian 12 So... just upgrade and you get the new apt output "for free" ;-)