Search results

Now I don't understand. Both when "working" and when "not working" you successfully receive a good answer. So in both situations it resolves OK. Could you describe the facts in more details?

Hello, start from finding what is the DNS server for this VM (when resolving works and when doesn't). Edit: for instance execute nslookup google.com and see what the IP address is in the lines Server: and Address: (the Address: just below Server:, not below "answer" section). Like in an...

Hello, kolanob. What were these commands? You have shown only the output, no the commands.

Hi, a2c! Would you mind posting the corrected file? It can be helpful for the community :) .

And probably verify in /boot/grub/grub.cfg the proper linux lines. With the default VG these are for instance linux /boot/vmlinuz-6.8.12-16-pve root=/dev/mapper/pve-root ...

No and yes. That table says "no" but it has the remark numbered "2": 2: "On file based storages, snapshots are possible with the qcow2 format."

I have thought and compared various sources for almost an hour and my idea now is: remove these introducing lines you mentioned here: "and my full certificate chain in the Certificate Chain Field: Starting with: Bag Attributes localKeyID friendlyName subject issuer" Maybe they confuse PVE...

FWIW, I observe the opposite :). Here you are my observations (posted in https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/proxmox-is-backing-up-my-entire-physical-disk-rather-than-just-used-space.165057/post-813185 ): "usually subsequent backups of running VMs, executed in "snapshot" mode, last substantially...

As you wrote that PVE and PBS are separate, It can depend on other elements of the network. I remember some posts in the Forum showing the method to verify it. I'll probably find them again in a few minutes... Edit: I can't find it now and maybe even it's not needed provided both servers have it...

I imagine PMG doesn't try to override such low level settings (but it's only my "gut feeling" ;-)). Just try and you'll see. Empirical testing is the best way to verify :). Even if it won't work, I don't think it'll make any harm.

Is MTU the same in all the network path?

If I understand you correctly, you want to keep using IPv6 (and IPv4) when receiving mail but now not use IPv6 for sending. Quoting https://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_address_preference "configure Postfix to receive mail over both IPv4 and IPv6, and to deliver mail over only IPv4...

Hi, this post may give a tip: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/offsite-backup-to-external-usb-drive-possible.173374/post-806437

Hi. The full docs at https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/chapter-pvesm.html are newer ("Last updated Tue Aug 5 16:04:45 CEST 2025"), though I haven't checked whether they answer your questions :-).

Great! I'm happy we've found the reason! :) Now you can edit the subject of the thread and from the drop-down menu select "[SOLVED]" as the prefix. Good luck!

The first problem I can see is instructing potential users to execute unknown scripts directly from some Internet source (curl to bash). I.e., without downloading it (as unpriviliged) user first. Without verifying the hash and the GPG signature. Without optionally uploading the script to...

They can. From the linked docs: "Newly generated API tokens don't have any permissions." And a fragment above: "API tokens serve two purposes: [...] 2. Limit permissions for each client/token within the users' permission" Thanks to this, the user is able to give precise (not only maximal)...

Maybe the last tip from my post is useful in this situation: you can use -CApath or -CAfile to specify the CA.

I don't remember the details how I did that :). BTW, make sure you don't give excessive permissions to the user. The following roles should be enough: /datastore/{store} DatastoreAudit Propagate: yes /datastore/{store}/{ns} DatastoreBackup Propagate: yes

Hi. In the https://pbs.proxmox.com/docs/user-management.html#objects-and-paths I read: "Access permissions are assigned to objects, such as a datastore, namespace or some system resources. [...] /datastore/{store}/{ns}Access to a specific namespace on a specific datastore " Doesn't it work...