Search results

Ich nutze ZFS local Storages nicht für automatisches HA. Das ist mir zu tricky, außerdem kann man gleich mal ein paar Minuten an Daten verliern. Aber ich würde jetzt mal behaupten, dass es sich gleich verhält wie auch ohne Autosnapshot. Es sind halt einige Snapshots mehr. Das, was ich dir aber...

Hello @sgrygowski and welcome to the Proxmox Community Forums. I would like to point out three things right at the start: We only provide support in German or English. Therefore, please do not post screenshots in Polish in future. This is a forum for Proxmox virtualization, not for...

Hello @Tomm and welcome to Proxmox Community :) I also use Kubuntu Desktop, and it works very well. Even installing it on a server-version should not be a problem. 25.04 is a unstable version of Ubuntu. A lot of usertesting is often done on this version. Therefore, I would recommend that you...

Ich würde da einen etwas anderen Weg vorschlagen. Zusätzlichen zu meinen zwei Proxmox Backup Servern, mache auch lokale Backups/Snapshots, wenn man es so sagen darf. Ich finde das effizient und es geht superschnell. Hierfür verwende ich ZFS Autosnaptshot. Für mich war das die bessere Lösung.

Good to know. Thanks for shareing this.

This version is not yet officially available as LXC. It is probably still too new. https://almalinux.org/get-almalinux/#Incus-LXC

Is there perhaps a limitation in Jellyfin that needs to be set? The error message CUDA_ERROR_LAUNCH_FAILED: unspecified launch failure indicates that the GPU resources are exhausted or there is a conflict with the CUDA context creation. The card is not particularly powerful either. I have an...

Ich kommentiere auch noch schnell ;) ... würde zumindest bei den Projekten, die ich kenne, keinen Grund mehr kennen da für die Verwaltung überhaupt an ein Windows AD zu denken. https://www.univention.de/produkte/ucs/ Seit über 5 Jahren dabei. So enspannt war ich mit verwalten schon ewig nicht...

Das wäre in dem Fall auch völlig ineffizent. ZFS kopiert blockweise, das bedeutet unabhängig vom Inhalt. Weil wenn du z.B. viele kleine Dateien hast und das über wincp oder rsync kopierst, dauert das viel, viel länger als wenn und es block weise mit "zfs send" kopierst.

I have now also carried out the update here on my Server 2022. I can confirm that I have received a new network interface. However, the MAC and IP remain the same. The server generally obtains its IP via DHCP (fixed via MAC).

According to this, only 256 MB are allocated, which is the default setting after installation. If you have configured 50%, the service must be restarted. Restart the service again. Has anything changed? And also post your config: cat /etc/default/zramswap

Well, the available swap has increased, but not by 3.82 GB. You can configure the 50% here: "/etc/default/zramswap" # Compression algorithm selection # speed: lz4 > zstd > lzo # compression: zstd > lzo > lz4 # This is not inclusive of all that is available in latest kernels # See...

Maybe it's time to get something new ;) After increasing it to 50%, the service must also be restarted. systemctl restart zramswap.service Then 4GB of compressed RAM will be allocated to your SWAP and used preferentially if RAM becomes scarce. Otherwise, it looks okay in terms of resources.

@pumapumapumas Which NMVE's are you using exactly?

Thanks for the information. Your Proxmox VE has a total of 8 GB memory + swap. That is really not much. Of that, 7 GB is allocated to the VMs. This leaves Proxmox itself with only 1 GB. Please also review the system requirements. If you have 8 GB of RAM available, I would allocate a maximum of 4...

@UdoB is absolutely right. That way, you can install Debian with LUKS, for example. This would mean that the VM would be fully encrypted. I use the native encryption of ZFS directly on Proxmox VE. This means I don't have to worry about encryption in VMs. I find this easier to manage.

Which file system are you using? Is the PMG installed physically or as a virtual machine?

My screenshot is from a VM in Proxmox. The part shows where USB devices can be passed on to a VM, e.g. HAOS (which I also use). Does the server have enough resources? Memory, storage space, CPU? Post the technical details of your server. And also your VM configurations. For VMs: qm config...

There should be no reason not to. You can pass the USB hard drives directly to the VM. If you use the Vendor/Device ID, you can always connect the drives to any USB port.

Ja das stimmt. Ich würde keinen Grund sehen, warum man das machen möchte. Das macht es nur komplexer. PBS sollte physisch installiert werden, keine VM und kein CT. Mit lokalem schnellen Storage. Und ja, ZFS ist grundsätzlich ne sehr feine Sache. Ich antworte mir selbst und vermute mal das es...