Recent content by Wolvez

Yea after I posted I switched to amd_pstate=active. There didn't seem to be a difference between the EPP performance or powersave governors. Today I enabled CPPC and a couple of other options in the BIOS. Now there seems to be a difference between the two. The performance governor is more...

I'm on an AMD EPYC Rome CPU Since PVE7 and kernel 5.15 I have been running the schedutil governor(!LIKE YOU'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO!) since it gave me a 10-15watt power reduction. After upgrading to PVE8 and kernel 6.2 I added amd_pstate=passive to the kernel command line to take advantage of the...

The microcode not loading could be related to the boot loader in use. I'm on a ZFS root and Proxmox is using Systemd-boot. If your install is using GRUB you may need to change the grub config to load microcode updates. I'm not sure as I only have this one Proxmox install currently.

For Debin 12/Bookworm+ they moved firmware blobs to: non-free-firmware If you don't need any software from non-free just change that to non-free-firmware If you do just add it to the end of each of the 3 lines.

How are you checking to see if the new firmware was being loaded at boot? I haven't done anything special to load microcode. https://wiki.debian.org/Microcode Checking the microcode version of your CPU: dmesg | grep "microcode updated early to" journalctl -b -k | grep "microcode updated early...

Thanks for the reply. I do not regret paying the Proxmox team 100 Euros a year. I figured out why I was confused. It was because of the pve-firmware package. Not sure what firmware is included in that package. I decided to live life in the danger zone and pulled amd64-microcode from unstable...

Does Proxmox ship their own CPU microcode packages? For example: amd64-microcode or intel-microcode? Or is it necessary to add non-free-firmware to sources.list for PVE8/bookworm and newer, so we can get the latest microcode for CPUs?

I am trying to add a disclaimer to incoming emails that have a detected "spam URL" in the message body. Is it possible to use macros in the Match Field option in What Objects? This is what Im trying: Rule: Action: URIBL_DBL_SPAM What: Spam URL Priority: 75 Action: URIBL_DBL_SPAM...