Recent content by vizerei

  1. V

    Easiest way to share storage across LXC containers

    This is a brilliant link, I've been banging my head against the manual solutions for a while and this would make everything SO MUCH EASIER. Going to give this a try!
  2. V

    VM shows 0.0% disk usage

    If there is a recommended workaround that customers are expected to generally perform then I don't think that "it's not as easy as it seems" holds much water. That could be automated behind the scenes.
  3. V

    VM shows 0.0% disk usage

    So looking through this and other threads, and at the bug report it seems this issue has been going on for 5 years. For such a basic hypervisor functionality is there any way to get this looked at with more priority? Not to be obtuse, but we're paying full licensing for 7 servers and this...
  4. V

    NetApp & ProxMox VE

    You should 100% be able to share between multiple nodes. We share NFS shares between two different clusters. The benefit of NFS is that file locks and write conflicts are solved by the sharing VM as opposed to treating it as two writes to the same block device. The abstraction layer gives you...
  5. V

    plugin api or how to add features to proxmox web gui?

    I keep seeing these responses from Proxmox devs: Join the developer group. Can we maybe discuss a way to open up the GUI to make it extensible in an easier way for everyone? What if I have a very specific use case I want to customize? If the answer is "help develop it" then a specific niche...
  6. V

    Ceph pool size (is 2/1 really a bad idea?)

    Revisiting this necrod thread a few years later. We decided to go 2:1 in our production environment. We have 7 hosts each full on disks. We wanted to use more of the storage space and accepted this risk because in an enterprise environment we're not relying JUST on Ceph. We have a full...
  7. V

    proxmox netapp storage plugin

    I am guessing no as the repo hasn't been updated in a decade.... It MIGHT, but it's one of those "use at your own risk" type of things.
  8. V

    NetApp & ProxMox VE

    Yeah it can get weird. Our company's product involves live moving networks and MTU is something we deal with regularly. Really was just a bad assumption on my part from switchport configurations that I didn't doublecheck on on the prod side stacks.
  9. V

    NetApp & ProxMox VE

    Yeah we were very certain that wasn't an issue, this is an under warranty VXRAIL Cluster that was previously running ESXi and VSAN using all ports in our production environment with no issues. Our 640s that now run production might have been suspect as they're a gen old, but unlikely that we...
  10. V

    NetApp & ProxMox VE

    We have solved this, Falk was right. My first thought was that can't be an issue as we mount NFS shares from the NetApp on Linux VMs regularly in our environment, but then it dawned on me that the VMs likely weren't configured for jumbo frames. @Bradomski ran with this first thing this morning...
  11. V

    NetApp & ProxMox VE

    We can definitely try that, but I'm my experience that much delay indicates issues. What we DID do was exercise the shares at their mount points after the add and found regular delays in simple things like ls. Listing files in a directory should be zero time, not even taking in to account an...
  12. V

    NetApp & ProxMox VE

    Chiming in, I work with Brad. MTUs are 9216 everywhere on our "storage" VLAN. All shares were added via the GUI. We've tried disabling kerberos as suggested in another thread (and only disabling certain versions). We've also set individual share permissions to 777 but no change. Initial add was...
  13. V

    Open vSwitch configuration in 3.2

    I believe the OP asked how to do it. While what to do is great, a lot of people here are not familiar with OVS, get even more confused in proxmox's implimentation versus OVS tutorials on the web, and would appreciate some instruction. Proxmox recommends you configure using the GUI, but I am in...