verulian's latest activity

  • V
    verulian replied to the thread What is the method to utilize efficient ZFS daily snapshots to keep a backup of containers and vms?.
    I ended up stepping away from this issue @DarkSpark due to other demands. I do need to revisit it though... I'll see what I can do. First stop will probably be Sanoid/Syncoid for policy snapshots + ZFS send/recv: •...
  • V
    verulian replied to the thread New Mobile App for Proxmox VE!.
    Would still love to see iOS version of the official app.
  • V
    verulian replied to the thread Pretty cool: Lower power usage models?.
    Let's actually find out vs having speculative pontifications... A lot of the naysaying here is not feet-on-pavement experience, but rather expressions of belief.
  • V
    verulian reacted to mike the newb's post in the thread Pretty cool: Lower power usage models? with Like Like.
    Yep, that'll suck up some power. I'd be looking for power savings too :)
  • V
    verulian replied to the thread Pretty cool: Lower power usage models?.
    I’m running three Dell PowerEdge R710s (not clustered), 128GB RAM each, dual Xeons, with Proxmox. Across the trio I host ~10-20 LXC containers and 8-15 VMs. Per box I see ~350W peak, ~250W average, and ~160W idle (single 570W PSU, mostly SSDs)...
  • V
    verulian replied to the thread Pretty cool: Lower power usage models?.
    Do you not think it would be worthwhile to share such information for the community so that I myself don't end up with a nice Frankenstein's monster-style creation that others cannot enjoy? Yes, the beauty of open source: share and others can...
  • V
    verulian posted the thread Pretty cool: Lower power usage models? in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.
    I haven't read these yet, but I thought they sounded quite interesting if they could could perhaps translate to seeing Proxmox being able to somehow integrate a low-power usage model that might make some (seeming small) tradeoffs for deeper...
  • V
    verulian replied to the thread Proxmox on aarch64 (arm64).
    Got it. So you go and start ad hominem attacks right off the bat to try to humiliate and minimize my authority so your remarks will stand out more... Pretty shitty move guy. Really does make me wonder why I even try on this forum because the bias...
  • V
    verulian replied to the thread Proxmox on aarch64 (arm64).
    So I went ahead and decided I should followup with you @Johannes S and for any Proxmox devs as well as anyone else who might reference this thread. Regarding the two main claims here, both of which do not hold when you look at the numbers and...
  • V
    verulian replied to the thread Proxmox on aarch64 (arm64).
    Uhm... Enormous numbers of companies are providing software for macOS. So much so that I was able to abandon Windows essentially 100% around a decade ago. Very, very easily arguable now that macOS has FAR superior software in every aspect to...
  • V
    verulian reacted to jlauro's post in the thread Proxmox on aarch64 (arm64) with Like Like.
    I am sure we would get at least 2-6 support subscriptions if it supported Mac OS guests (on Apple hardware to keep licenses happy). 5-15% compared to our x86_64 subscriptions. I am sure most companies need at least 5% for mac builders, qa...
  • V
    verulian reacted to kaffien's post in the thread Proxmox on aarch64 (arm64) with Like Like.
    I just bought an orange pi 5 plus 32gb. For a fun project with Proxmox on arm. How the heck are you guys not supporting or at least encouraging arm compatibility? Spread like a virus to all the architectures. Let new folks setup labs on...
Show older items
Top Bottom