Like I said, tools like Parallels are the current target, especially for using it on newer M4 systems. So yeah, getting Proxmox arm64 non-third-party support is pretty dang important.
Yes, it's very doable via Asahi Linux (Debian 12) or Fedora Asahi Remix.
However, what is more interesting right now is to use an option like Parallels or VMware to run the arm64 version, which is what I'm doing via the fork.
@Kingneutron too true. This would be fantastic for M1 Minis and many M1 systems. I mean, M1 Max MacBook Pros are still running strong here too for regular use, BUT I could really see a number of M1 Minis being repurposed for Proxmox hosts.
For those of us with Macs with high specs and an M4 level processor, Proxmox support for macOS is becoming more and more desirable. It feels like it would simplify things quite a bit and while the fork "works" it feels uncomfortable to not be...
Since we're getting close to the release of DGX Spark, I do believe that have a Proxmox available for ARM it will be definitely much much interesting.It's not his official purpose, but with 128GB of unified ram, and a 40gbps and 10gbps NICs, it...
Sounds like we're in the same boat. MS is still evil - was then and is now. Big Goog is just as bad - if not a little more. Obviously we're in the context of mobile platforms and thus not a more robust discussion of the evilness of these...
Apple dropping the ball on AI is entirely immaterial to this topic. Frankly, they have so much capital that they could come in and buy xAI or OpenAI at any given moment and not miss a beat. I just want to use Proxmox on a Proxmox-org-developed...