UdoB's latest activity
-
UdoB replied to the thread Yet another "ZFS on HW-RAID" Thread (with benchmarks).I've often said that I am a ZFS fan. But hey, this is not the Butlerian Jihad with "filesystems" as the topic. The system I am using in this very moment has a normal ext4 filesystem :-) -
UdoB reacted to Johannes S's post in the thread Yet another "ZFS on HW-RAID" Thread (with benchmarks) with
Like.
I think it's rather odd to call people "dogmatic" who don't want people to risc their data due to not following best practices. If this is dogmatic I'm a dogmatic too and would prefer not to get insulted for trying to keep people from getting burnt. -
UdoB reacted to d.oishi's post in the thread VMware Migration - Scenario & Seeking Advice with Like.
Given the scope of this project, it might be worth considering a proper subscription and opening a support ticket before finalizing the proposal. Since this is a client-facing production migration with downtime constraints, backup implications...
-
UdoB reacted to Johannes S's post in the thread Is there really no handling for if a datastore fills up to 100%? with Like.
A possible mitigation is to set a quota on your datastores filesystem. All modern Linux filesystems have that feature: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/proxmox-backup-server-3-1-2-set-zfs-quotas.139917/ https://linux.die.net/man/8/xfs_quota...
-
UdoB reacted to Impact's post in the thread Is there really no handling for if a datastore fills up to 100%? with Like.
See here and related bugs: https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=7254
-
UdoB replied to the thread Yet another "ZFS on HW-RAID" Thread (with benchmarks).The point is: you can not know that. Of course you are free to use any available technology you want - and a lot of installations are using hardware Raid (edit: ... without a checksumming filesystem). No fight here; if it works for you/them...
-
Du hast, sobald die OPNSense läuft 2 DHCP-Server am laufen. Klar, dass du dann unterschiedlich die IPs vergibts. Sobald die OPNSense läuft, musst Du dort dein Netz konfigurieren. Netzadresse, DHCP-Bereich etc. Und sofort / im selben Zug in der...
-
Du willst sehr viel und hast mit OPNsense und ProxmoxVE dir gleich zwei relativ komplexe Themen ausgesucht. Ich würde daher dringend raten sich am Anfang zu beschränken, way willst du überhaupt erreichen? Dinge lernen, dann ist ProxmoxVE super...
-
UdoB reacted to Johannes S's post in the thread [SOLVED] Why in doc is required a "dedicated nic" ? with Like.
Where did you read that? https://pdm.proxmox.com/docs/installation.html#system-requirements doesn't have this. It mentiones a nic as minimum requirement since you will obviouvsly need one for a bare-metal non-virtualized install. The...
-
@UdoB a number of studies done during Dr Steve Hetzler's time at IBM research. All (or mostly all ;) ) on archive.org.... smorgastor.drhetzler.com When I find some Round Tuits I'll try to dredge up what I've got.
-
UdoB replied to the thread HP Smart Array P408i-a RAID vs ZFS on single node.For me reliability comes first, performance is second. If you do not use ZFS you'll lose some really great features which are important for me...
-
UdoB reacted to VictorSTS's post in the thread Proper way to set up a Proxmox cluster on a dedicated VLAN (separate from Management) with Like.
For a fully redundant corosync, use at least two logically and physically independent links. Management. That will be populated automatically by PVE on install using the IP address you configure during setup. Yes, but you should add at least a...
-
UdoB reacted to d.oishi's post in the thread How to replicate VMKernels and different IPs in proxmox? with Like.
If your goal is to provide redundancy for two physical NICs and use multiple VLANs on them, Proxmox can do this without SDN in most cases. A common approach is as follows: Use bonding for NIC redundancy, create VLAN interfaces on that bonding...
-
UdoB reacted to Johannes S's post in the thread Proxmox 8.4 soon EOL, Do i NEED Px Backup Server? with Like.
Meh. Another example why these "bullshit as a service"-providers are actually not that helpful. Depending on your usecase, regulations and operating systems stop might actually be more safe. Both variants have their own up- and downsides. It...
-
UdoB reacted to Johannes S's post in the thread Opt-in Linux 7.0 Kernel for Proxmox VE 9 available with Like.
Imho you don't get much that way because at some point the kernel 6.17 won't get this updates anymore. So imho pinning proxmox-default-kernel gives a kind of wrong security feel. But to be honest in the end it boils down to personal preference...
-
UdoB reacted to aaron's post in the thread [SOLVED] Vm in readonly mode when backup is running? with Like.
When VMs are getting backed up with Proxmox VE native backup methods, VMs will continue to fully run during the backup. 3rd party vendors can utilize the public backup API. Then things work the same. If they use a custom implementation under the...
-
UdoB reacted to nadirian's post in the thread Proxmox 8.4 soon EOL, Do i NEED Px Backup Server? with Like.
I'll have you all know! That i installed PBS to do my backups instead of Proxmox doing snapshots (i dont really see the difference, but it feeels better). And i went through my pve8to9 --full script, and ran all the suggestions that were provided...
-
UdoB reacted to Johannes S's post in the thread Supported way for a NAS across multiple nodes that supports thin disks, snapshots, live migrations, move disks, and HA? with Like.
Do you mean the qcow feature introduced in PVE9? It's limited to snapshots (although main developer @spirit mentioned at some point that in theory this might also be a possible way to implement thin provisioning, but afik nothing happened since...
-
click
-
UdoB replied to the thread force old kernel.https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs-8/pve-admin-guide.html#sysboot_kernel_pin