Recent content by tuxevil

Great to know, sorry for the newbie question! Thanks

raid1 should be faster?

Strangly today it started to work as expected

Well, scores improved as soon as I finished installing Windows on a VM But it was just 1 VM running, the DL380 have 16 VMs running 24/7

Hi all, Im having perf issues with a "new" server in my cluster, I notice the "new" and strongest one is working very slow. My old server is a HP DL380G7 And my "new" server is a HP DL580G7 I have to mention the 380 have 8 SAS 10K 300GB HDDs in RAID5 and the 580 have 3 SATA 5.4K 1TB HDDs in...

Yes, I removed the local-lvm from my cluster so when I join the new node to the cluster, it doesn't shows anymore, then I add manually a new storage of LVM type because I could not add a lvm-thin How should I proceed, I'm not interested in lvm-thin as I had speed issues before, restoring my VMS...

Hi, help please Why is my local-lvm of the newly installed server saying it is full? root@vdi:~# vgdisplay --- Volume group --- VG Name pve System ID Format lvm2 Metadata Areas 1 Metadata Sequence No 7 VG Access read/write VG...

HI, one question, if i pause the vm, what happens with the resources, like cpu and ram, they are realeased? or for that i need hibernation? (for releasing resources)

Oh, ok, thanks for clarifing it

if i do get /nodes/{node}/tracker i get all the mails of the last 24h but when i do get /nodes/{node}/tracker -starttime 3 or whatever number i get a 200 OK [ ] in response what im doing wrong? i wanted to see all the mails from the last 3 days

Great I found that i can get the tracking center info from nodes/{node}/tracker thank you very much

Hi everyone, Im using PMG in a production enviroment since january, and im really happy with it. Now im trying to improve (automate if posible) my daily workflow, about monitoring the tracking center, looking for quarentine mails and most important, rejected mails. I have found several spoofing...

Ok, so ZFS is discarted, because I dont want to mess it up with the RAID controller. Looking at my SMART reports you think HDDs are needed to be replaced, even if they report as "OK"? For a temporal solution Im copying the backup files to my test server (another proxmox in the cluster), it is...

Im researching about the results, and it looks like "Elements in grown defect list" and "Total uncorrected errors" are pretty bad for DISK0 and kind of bad for DISK2 DISK5 wich looks perfect is configured as spare drive, I have never done this before, but if I remove DISK0 I guess my RAID...