Recent content by tchatzi

  1. T

    [SOLVED] uncommon and difficult to describe VLAN issue

    Yes, thank you! The documentation isn't exactly clear on what it does, but it did work. If you find yourself in my neighborhood, drinks (or coffee or whatever) are on me.
  2. T

    [SOLVED] uncommon and difficult to describe VLAN issue

    Hello there, at my wits end on this one, since I cannot really find a reasonable explanation for this: a cluster of 3 proxmox nodes, each with 10 network interfaces, bonded in pairs with 802.3ad comprising 5 networks that have 7 VLANs in total Not using all that SDN stuff, mainly because I have...
  3. T

    Proxmox 7 kernel 5.15.35-2-pve does not support NFS over UDP mounts ?

    I know, that's why I asked if it's OK if I merely turn NFS_DISABLE_UDP_SUPPORT off and recompile. We'll cross that bridge when we get there :cool:
  4. T

    Proxmox 7 kernel 5.15.35-2-pve does not support NFS over UDP mounts ?

    > I cant think of a good reason why your failover should be slower with TCP vs UDP except non-optimized configuration for your specific > environment. This describes the situation quite accurately and mirrors our own experience closely. It is not quite possible to transparently failover TCP...
  5. T

    Proxmox 7 kernel 5.15.35-2-pve does not support NFS over UDP mounts ?

    OK, things being that way, I guess we have the following options: 1. Change to NFS over TCP 2. Download the debian kernel sources and recompile without NFS_DISABLE_UDP_SUPPORT (which of course entails maintaining the kernel package locally and tracking changes) 3. Keep running a kernel version <...
  6. T

    Proxmox 7 kernel 5.15.35-2-pve does not support NFS over UDP mounts ?

    The title says it all really, I upgraded the first host on our cluster yesterday and discovered that NFS mounts were not available. The NFS server is happily humming along, but the mounts were marked as offline. Trying to mount by hand, resulted in : # mount -v -t nfs...