As the GUI and pmgsh use the same code-paths in the backend this sounds odd or might point to a quoting issue - which entries do you try to add/create
(please anonymize what you don't want to have public - but keep it consistent (if your replace...
From a quick check your analysis is correct - creating a new selector in the GUI/CLI/pmgsh will set it as the currently used one and the TXT record is only shown for the currently set selector.
Options if your workaround does not work for you:
*...
it seems you're still running the postgresql server version 15 (on port 5432):
see: https://pmg.proxmox.com/wiki/Upgrade_from_8_to_9#Upgrade_the_PostgreSQL_database
this should take care of the collation warnings as well.
I hope this helps!
did you upgrade the postgres cluster? (did you drop the old postgres cluster after the upgrade)? here the warnings went away latest after a reboot with the system using the postgres version from trixie (without the need to run the alter database...
bounces generated by postfix itself do not pass through the filter processing and are thus not signed by PMG.
IIRC this should not be a problem if your PMG has a dedicated hostname (which then needs to _not_ have a DMARC policy)
else if you...
The regex you posted works here on a test-setup (single what-object in the rule, action block).
please share:
* `pmgdb dump --rules active`
* the logs for that mail (best from the journal)
keep in mind that receiving mail-servers might also score those mails higher.
but to answer your question - you should be able to lower the score or disable the rule with a custom score (for disabling use 0 as score)...
Danke für die Bestätigung. Bin jetzt am grommunio Server am Suchen. Habe jetzt eine Archivierung aller ankommenden Mails im PMG an ein ArchivPostfach mit BCC Filter eingerichtet und werde die Kommunikation jetzt einige Tage detailliert scannen...
Die mail wurde laut log zugestellt - und damit am PMG aus der queue gelöscht (sie ist nicht mehr am system)
Die erste Zeile zeigt, dass die mail am 28.1.2025 vo 192.168.200.201 angenommen wurde (dort sollte die suche nach F0C0868E3D7 in den Logs...
See: https://pmg.proxmox.com/pmg-docs/pmg-admin-guide.html#pmgconfig_welcomelist_overview
the user block/welcome lists only tweak the spamscore - what happens with those mails depends on the rules configured by the admin.
If you configure a rule...
This is usually handled by enabling recipient verification:
https://pmg.proxmox.com/pmg-docs/pmg-admin-guide.html#pmgconfig_mailproxy_options
you can disable the logging to /var/log/mail.log in rsyslog.conf (/var/log/syslog is used for the...
Thanks for the report! we managed to reproduce the issue - and are currently working on a patch:
https://lore.proxmox.com/pmg-devel/20251028163628.79739-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com/T/#t
Once we apply an improved version it should work again!
In theory there is no safe way to upgrade if you don't remember what you did on a system. But I'd say that most changes should be preserved if you upgrade in place and carefully compare the configuration changes the upgrade process asks you...
yes, there ware duplicate entries in the /etc/resolv.conf
Maybe from importing the old configuration.
I cleaned it and the dkim are now valid again.
Thank you for the tip.