Danke!! - aber in dem Fall hat die mail ja laut google-mx eine gueltige DKIM signature:
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com;...dkim=pass header.i=XXXX header.s=xxx ....
spf=pass (google.com: domain of..... as permitted sender)XXXX...
Bitte mal die header einer solchen mail (oder die gesamte Mail) teilen - und auch domain darin lassen - damit wir das hier nachvollziehen können.
(post kann auch gleich danach gelöscht werden).
We identified a potential issue with the new mobile GUI - and @dcsapak sent a fix - I assume this should fix the issue once it's applied:
https://lore.proxmox.com/pmg-devel/20251020170350.771358ce@rosa.proxmox.com/T/#t
Thanks for the report!
one possible explanation is that you sent the mails to the external port - signing only happens on the internal port (for outbound mail):
https://pmg.proxmox.com/pmg-docs/pmg-admin-guide.html#pmgconfig_mailproxy_dkim
I'd also suggest to add all...
There's a similar report in the German forum:
https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/fehler-beim-upgrade-auf-version-9-im-proxmox-container.173238/
In that case - upgrading PVE fixed the issue for them...
if that's not helping for you -please open...
I would really suggest to reconsider this - the quarantine loses it's meaning if you sent one mail for each potentially problematic mail, causing the recipient to both be distracted, and to be more likely to simply click on deliver ....
If you...
hm - Wie werden die mails nach dem PMG weitergeleitet - geht das direkt ins internet - oder ist da noch eine content-inspecting firewall oder sonst ein filter dazwischen?
Do you use an LDAP login for your users to log into the quarantine?
If you don't switch the user agent (I assume select "use Desktop version" on the mobile site) - what error do you get?!
Which errors do you get - please share the journal and...
Ich sehe das Leerzeichen jetzt in den screenshots nicht- wird das von MXToolbox so reported, wenn eine Mail hingeschickt wird? oder ist das der DKIM lookup und dort wird domain und selector reingepasted? (dann würde ich nochmal sicherstellen...
I still don't understand what is failing?
The interface changed (it's based on a different framework now) - however login through a quarantine link still works for me...
Thanks for the hint and the multiple reports!
sent a patch that addresses this (by reversing the order so that text/plain comes before text/html):
https://lore.proxmox.com/pmg-devel/20251013110719.18486-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com/T/#t
This should...
Freut mich dass das Anpassen problemlos war!
Habe mal einen Patch für pmg-api geschickt, damit die backward-compatibility doch funktioniert:
https://lore.proxmox.com/pmg-devel/20251013110719.18486-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com/T/#t
Danke jedenfalls...
Hm - ist potentiell ein Fehler beim hinzufügen der API-methods für backward-compatibility.
Es wurden Black-/Whitelist durch Block-/Welcomelist ersetzt - siehe https://pmg.proxmox.com/wiki/Roadmap#Proxmox_Mail_Gateway_9.0
Ich nehme an, es wurde...
While the quarantine interface did change for mobile devices between PMG 8.2 and 9.0 - it should not change if you can login with the link in the quarantine report or not (I assume this is what you mean with token link in the e-mail)
Please...
Which settings are you referring to?
What gets changed that should stay that way?
(If you could provide some logs/screenshots it might help see what is missing)
Thanks!
Your interface is name is too long, Linux kernel only supports up to 15 bytes (= 15 ASCII characters). That's most likely why it doesn't work.
I'll check what's wrong with validation - but in the meanwhile you should be able to fix your issue by...