Hi!
Sorry but I've a question concerning the old PVE 4.4 version. I've a PVE cluster still using this version.
The PVE cluster of 5 nodes. On the node one, corosync don't want to start. It say that the config is not in sync.
corosync[28838]: [CMAP ] Received config version (7) is different...
Some news.
The retpoline patches to mitigate Spectre 2 have been integrated in the 4.15 tree and back-ported in 4.9.77 & 4.14.14 kernels.
https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/ChangeLog-4.9.77
https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/ChangeLog-4.14.14
GCC is not upgraded yet for...
Hi!
Found a guy who tried Meltdown patch with Virtuozzo Container on a SSD HP blade.
Nice result. ☹️
https://communities.intel.com/thread/121555?wapkw=meltdown
Hi!
Compatibility and stability problems with mitigation codes continue and rise.
Spectre and Meltdown patches causing trouble as realistic attacks get closer
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2018/01/spectre-and-meltdown-patches-causing-trouble-as-realistic-attacks-get-closer/
Meltdown/Spectre...
Online talk of PTI not PCID.
For PCID, I've not found yet any good bench of fix flaw impact.
The article by arstechnica talks about this but does not provide very detailed proof of these statements...
A nice article from arstechnica.
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2018/01/heres-how-and-why-the-spectre-and-meltdown-patches-will-hurt-performance/
Another one for OSX (look a syscall bench, crazy).
https://reverse.put.as/2018/01/07/measuring-osx-meltdown-patches-performance/
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.