silverstone's latest activity
-
Ssilverstone replied to the thread [SOLVED] One Debian Guest VM extremely slow on Proxmox VE 9 - all other seem fine on the same Host.Yeah, a very stupid one you could say :(. Weird that I didn't notice it until now o_O . Yet another Case of the Problem being between the Chair and the Screen. Sorry about that :(. I would have guessed that since the default none Cache Options...
-
Ssilverstone reacted to fabian's post in the thread [SOLVED] One Debian Guest VM extremely slow on Proxmox VE 9 - all other seem fine on the same Host with
Like.
so it was an I/O issue after all, just not a usual one :-P glad it cleared up! -
Ssilverstone replied to the thread [SOLVED] One Debian Guest VM extremely slow on Proxmox VE 9 - all other seem fine on the same Host.@fabian: spotted the Issue, almost by coincidence, while cleaning up /etc/fstab File. There was a sync Mount Option set for the / Filesystem in /etc/fstab :rolleyes: . Not sure why I did that some Time ago ... So essentially every single write...
-
Ssilverstone replied to the thread [SOLVED] One Debian Guest VM extremely slow on Proxmox VE 9 - all other seem fine on the same Host.For reference the same base Load on VM 156 APTCacherNG which is fast
-
-
Ssilverstone replied to the thread [SOLVED] One Debian Guest VM extremely slow on Proxmox VE 9 - all other seem fine on the same Host.Base Load on VM 151 MirrorNAS using atop
-
-
Ssilverstone replied to the thread [SOLVED] One Debian Guest VM extremely slow on Proxmox VE 9 - all other seem fine on the same Host.OK I'll stop it. Anyways the load is Peanuts I don't think it will make any difference.
-
Ssilverstone replied to the thread [SOLVED] One Debian Guest VM extremely slow on Proxmox VE 9 - all other seem fine on the same Host.@fabian: atop as you requested (fio still running)
-
-
Ssilverstone replied to the thread [SOLVED] One Debian Guest VM extremely slow on Proxmox VE 9 - all other seem fine on the same Host.iothread shouldn't matter and discard being disabled on the Fast VM (156 APTCacherNG) is even more weirder (it should be slower not faster if anything). I guess it doesn't make too much of a difference at this speed and probably only relevant...
-
Ssilverstone replied to the thread [SOLVED] One Debian Guest VM extremely slow on Proxmox VE 9 - all other seem fine on the same Host.htop (while fio Benchmark is running VERY SLOWLY) since I have it installed it already. I'll try to install atop as well ...
-
-
Ssilverstone replied to the thread [SOLVED] One Debian Guest VM extremely slow on Proxmox VE 9 - all other seem fine on the same Host.Do I need to stop the fio benchmarking ? It's doing 1K at Queue Depth 1 now (4th Test only) ...
-
Ssilverstone replied to the thread [SOLVED] One Debian Guest VM extremely slow on Proxmox VE 9 - all other seem fine on the same Host.Also the Load on the Guest 151 only If I were to take a blind Stab at it, I'd guess that only 10% of the CPU Power is actually being allocated. Not sure how that causes the Performance of the Storage to drop THIS much though. It's weird...
-
-
Ssilverstone replied to the thread [SOLVED] One Debian Guest VM extremely slow on Proxmox VE 9 - all other seem fine on the same Host.Not really. I mean right now the entire Server load as seen from the Host is very low and most of it it's caused by running fio right now. Everything else is pretty much Idle.
-
-
Ssilverstone replied to the thread [SOLVED] One Debian Guest VM extremely slow on Proxmox VE 9 - all other seem fine on the same Host.The Virtual Machine 151 MirrorNAS was left unbootable because I interrupted an apt dist-upgrade and that left either the Kernel or Initramfs in a bad State (probably due to a half-compiled ZFS DKMS Module). I basically did a rescue of that...
-
Ssilverstone replied to the thread [SOLVED] One Debian Guest VM extremely slow on Proxmox VE 9 - all other seem fine on the same Host.So @fabian First results are in for the Normal / Fast VM (156 - APTCacherNG). Now I'm recovering the other one from a Chroot and it's MUCH faster already compared to when booted from the Virtual Disk (I booted from a Virtual USB Pendrive).
-
Ssilverstone replied to the thread [SOLVED] One Debian Guest VM extremely slow on Proxmox VE 9 - all other seem fine on the same Host.If it's an IO Issue, I'm curious as to why it only affects one VM. My initial Theory was q35 vs i440fx but that proved to not be the Case unfortunately :( . These are old VMs and therefore still using 8k for volblocksize (both of them). IIRC...
-
Ssilverstone replied to the thread [SOLVED] One Debian Guest VM extremely slow on Proxmox VE 9 - all other seem fine on the same Host.Thank you @fabian for your quick Reply. Storage Setup: root@pve99:~# zpool status pool: rpool state: ONLINE status: Some supported and requested features are not enabled on the pool. The pool can still be used, but some features are...
-
-
Ssilverstone posted the thread [SOLVED] One Debian Guest VM extremely slow on Proxmox VE 9 - all other seem fine on the same Host in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.I am having a Problem with one Debian Guest VM (running Debian 12 Bookworm AMD64, currently running the Upgrade to Debian 13 Trixie AMD64). It's extremely sluggish, even to just run apt update. While compiling Kernel Modules (e.g. zfs via dkms) I...
-
Ssilverstone reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Debian 13.1 LXC template fails to create/start (FIX) with Like.
The latest pve-container version 5.3.3 does not only adds the new Ubuntu releases, but for PVE 9 we also defused the hard checks to soft checks, which now only produce a warning in the case an unknown (to new) release is encountered. This was...
-
Ssilverstone replied to the thread Debian 13.1 LXC template fails to create/start (FIX).@t.lamprecht: wouldn't it be possible to allow also testing (next-stable) Releases of Containers to boot without Issue ? I am also running some CTs (and VMs) for the next Stable Release (Debian and Ubuntu currently, but I could imagine doing the...
-
Ssilverstone replied to the thread Debian 13.1 LXC template fails to create/start (FIX).I observed the same after upgrading a cloned CT to Ubuntu 25.10. Might want to add this to /usr/share/perl5/PVE/LXC/Setup/Ubuntu.pm since it's going to be released soon anyways: '25.10' => 1, # questing
