Recent content by shsm

If you want info what changes i need i can provide that info. In our setup we use MTA Exim4 instead of Postfix and we also need Exim4 in Services tab. Patch is trivial and we done it by Puppet. But in future we planning to use patched version from ours own repo.

:-) Hey, i still here with proxmox and i need add some modification to pve-manager v.3.0. I can build that package anyway but it will be more suitable with all necessary files.And after yours explanations about ent and not-ent repository my opinion for proxmox is positive again :-) C'mon keep it...

Hello!I have a small question about pve-manager sources. I've git clone of the source code of packages pve-manager but a found some error. "debian" directory missing two important files which need for package rebuilding with debian "debuild" utility. These files are: "changelog" and "rules"...

Sounds good. When you planning to add that SOURCE file?

Basically, you're right. My posting is nothing more than a symmetrical response to a guerilla way to make the purchase a subscription.

Hey, where's my last posting? Censorship is here. So i feel free move that ugly stort to outside location.

Are you going to provide access to sources of debian packages (deb-src) for enterprise users? It's an important issue for me. Sometimes i need make small changes in stable package and rebuild it. GIT source have no tags and that task more complicated than package rebuilding.

I going to buy the one license, it's no problem. But i absolutelly need optional deb-src in enterprise repo. Not as default option. But these sources have to be in repository according to AGPL. I have testing servers, and one of it was upgraded today. And sometimes we add new HW hosts to our...

Sorry, почитал более внимательно, понял в чем соль.

If Proxmox Team will provide for ent users deb-src it will be right, because ent customers already paid for "integration, testing, building, packaging, distributing". So they have right to get the sources. Before non-profit project was run we passed the investigation and choose only free...

Вы в корне не правы, лицензии на Proxmox VE касаются только HW node. Оплата только за сокет (физический) CPU. И запускать можно сколько угодно нод - это на оплату не влияет никак.In English: You are not right. Proxmox VE licensing affects HW node only (per CPU socket). So you can run how many...

Why? If you get money for binary packages, please provide a simple way to get THE SAME sources, like a Debian, whose code base you are using? Debian provide binaries for free. If they will provide binaries for the Proxmox project for a money too, huh?

So if i will pay for community licence i will received that info? And will i get the source of binary package in that case? If it's true why now ent repo haven't deb-src source line? If i pay for binaries i have to right get the same sources for simple repacking, right?

Do you planning to add a deb-src line in sources.list for an enterprise repo? Sometimes we will need to make some small changes in pve package (kernel). Of course, we can get sources from GIT but it's more complicated and we need to keep track versions manually. So if we will pay for access to...

I mean sockets so my calculation is right.And we choose Proxmox as a opensource and free solution for our wants. We started from 1.x version and planning to no any payments in future.