rungekutta's latest activity

  • R
    Pretty cool! But given TrueNAS history of disregard for forward and backward compatibility, breaking changes and lack of consistency across versions, I wonder if this is more trouble than it’s worth? Given that it would likely stop working again...
  • R
    Ah. Well. A 2 node cluster can work fine too, add a raspberry pi qdev for cluster quorum even with 1 node down. Ceph is obviously not an option then, so either VM storage on NAS with single point of failure or local storage with replication...
  • R
    Yes but less fun... ;-) Also makes Proxmox/os updates scarier, and more vulnerable to hardware problems with all eggs in one basket.
  • R
    Ceph is amazing but it needs at least 3 preferably 4 nodes and 10 or 25Gb networking. One typical homelab pattern would be to run all your nodes in a Proxmox/Ceph cluster and let that also be your VM storage, then layer one or several NAS VMs on...
  • R
    As you say, you could do both. Flash and ZFS on Proxmox for ultra-fast and resilient local VM storage. Then a NAS VM which provides slow(er) storage over the network, this could run TrueNAS if you like. Preferably with its own passed-through...
  • R
    Right, Proxmox itself doesn't provide a way to export iSCSI over the network. You could set it up relatively easily yourself, as the underlying Debian has built-in support for this (via targetcli), but you'll be bastardising your Promox install...
  • R
    TrueNAS makes its ZFS storage available for VM storage via network protocols such as NFS, iSCSI etc whether virtualised or not. If TrueNAS runs in a VM with paravirtualized network devices, it actually uses the network stack of the host, and will...