Ramalama's latest activity
-
RRamalama reacted to Neobin's post in the thread QEMU 9.2 available on pvetest and pve-no-subscription as of now with
Like.
https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/chapter-qm.html#qm_system_settings -> "PVE Machine Revision" https://git.proxmox.com/?p=qemu-server.git;a=commit;h=57db7085b85a0aad45c37e2077f591b41acc933a -
RRamalama replied to the thread PROXMOX ON A BAREMETAL SERVER WITH 18 x 3.84TB NVMe (ZFS?).You cant place dual controllers in 2 separate buildings. Blades have at least a separate mainboard, separate memory and separate CPUs, compared to 2 controllers in the same node. I hung up for the mechanical Layout, because thats how HA is...
-
RRamalama replied to the thread PROXMOX ON A BAREMETAL SERVER WITH 18 x 3.84TB NVMe (ZFS?).We buyed JovianDSS before 2022 and compared against TrueNas. At that time there was definitive no true HA on TrueNas. If things were different at that time, we would have gone TrueNas 100%. Especially because its surely cheaper. And Dual...
-
RRamalama replied to the thread QEMU 9.2 available on pvetest and pve-no-subscription as of now.maybe i missed something, but what is 9.2+pve1 ?
-
RRamalama replied to the thread PROXMOX ON A BAREMETAL SERVER WITH 18 x 3.84TB NVMe (ZFS?).Just readed, they talk about resilient replication, so i think its still the same periodically and simple zfs-send/receive. Even if its made every 5 seconds, its not the same. On JovianDSS (zfs) and Synology (btrfs) every blockchange gets...
-
RRamalama replied to the thread PROXMOX ON A BAREMETAL SERVER WITH 18 x 3.84TB NVMe (ZFS?).I know, we were in a decision some years ago. We wanted an zfs over iscsi solution that was able to run in HA. At that time we used Synology HA with iscsi for the esxi servers and needed to replace that, because Synology iscsi had some issues...
-
RRamalama replied to the thread PROXMOX ON A BAREMETAL SERVER WITH 18 x 3.84TB NVMe (ZFS?).And Synology is not garbage at all, you probably aware only about the home stuff. There are RS Servers, which run in proper high-availibilty and has xeons with ecc memory. Additionally to that, there is no other solution that im aware of, that...
-
RRamalama replied to the thread PROXMOX ON A BAREMETAL SERVER WITH 18 x 3.84TB NVMe (ZFS?).1. 12-15 Proxmox Servers alone. 2. There is no word about metadata off, i tested with metadata all and metadata only. 3. Block size on disks is 4kb native, on 7450/7500/cm7-r you can reformat the disks to different blocksizes either. 4. Others...
-
RRamalama replied to the thread PROXMOX ON A BAREMETAL SERVER WITH 18 x 3.84TB NVMe (ZFS?).BTRFS is used on Synology for a decade as default Filesystem. And im running 12x Kioxia CM7-R in BTRFS Raid-10 + 8x Micron 7450 Max in BTRFS Raid 10 a little over a Month now. No issues so far. But its true that BTRFS was in the past a little...
-
RRamalama replied to the thread PROXMOX ON A BAREMETAL SERVER WITH 18 x 3.84TB NVMe (ZFS?).You are simply a noob, read first the GitHub issue to the end. Btrfs is comparable to zfs in Performance on hdds, maybe on normal consumer ssds. But im talking about 20gbs write speed and 40gbs read speeds and about millions of iops. As long...
-
RRamalama replied to the thread PROXMOX ON A BAREMETAL SERVER WITH 18 x 3.84TB NVMe (ZFS?).Depends on the drives, in my case with 8x Micron 7450/7500 Max Drives in a Raid10, i switched from ZFS to Btrfs. Btrfs is especially on mysql Databases 5-10x as fast as ZFS. And in almost every other situation Btrfs is at least 2x faster. I...
-
RRamalama replied to the thread I want to like VirtIOFS, but....I hoped either to get finally rid from NFS, but after reading this, virtiofs seems to be senseless :-(
-
RRamalama replied to the thread Opt-in Linux 6.11 Kernel for Proxmox VE 8 available on test & no-subscription.Yeah test repos :-)
-
RRamalama reacted to ness1602's post in the thread Opt-in Linux 6.11 Kernel for Proxmox VE 8 available on test & no-subscription with Like.
I'm already running 2-3 hosts, works okay :)
-
RRamalama replied to the thread Opt-in Linux 6.11 Kernel for Proxmox VE 8 available on test & no-subscription.I seen that 6.14 is available xD How dangerous is it @Thomas Lamprecht Should i wait for zfs 2.3 before upgrading and testing? :-)
-
RRamalama replied to the thread QEMU 9.2 available on pvetest and pve-no-subscription as of now."Does QEMU 9.2.0 affect the CPU usage of Windows?" if you use the "host" profile -> NO But other Profiles should be updated either -> so 99,999% no either. "Does disabling HPET timer affect the performance of Windows virtual machines" Dunno...
-
RRamalama replied to the thread QEMU 9.2 available on pvetest and pve-no-subscription as of now.sorry, i missreaded. but replyed you on the other thread.
-
RRamalama replied to the thread Ugreen dxp4800+ iGPU 99% success (Win Server 2025).IGPU needs at boot some firmware injected. [drm] Finished loading DMC firmware i915/dg2_dmc_ver2_08.bin [drm] GT0: GuC firmware i915/dg2_guc_70.bin version 70.36.0 [drm] GT0: HuC firmware i915/dg2_huc_gsc.bin version 7.10.16 It maybe the reason...
-
RRamalama replied to the thread IPv6 problems (maybe from proxmox!).Try to disable multicast snooping on the bridge. I need todo the same for example to get ospf properly working, ospf works without either but not reliable for me on opnsense for example. auto vmbr0 iface vmbr0 inet static address...
-
RRamalama replied to the thread QEMU 9.2 available on pvetest and pve-no-subscription as of now.Oh just for the sake of completeness, everywhere i use passthrough, im using q35. Im using q35 even for almost everything, i think there may be 2-3 i440fx vms out of ~40-50. That time i started to passthrough devices it wasnt possible with...