ness1602's latest activity
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread Switch from Host to x86-64-v3.If you need something like AfterEffects inside vm you can use max as cpu type.
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread Problem Windows Server 2022 + RDS + FSlogix.For my customers we are using rds farm + fslogic on CEPH tbh, not on local disks. Try changing cpu type to something instead of host. Also maybe screenshots of load and io of the VM,maybe you have something like I/O stall?
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread Moving VMs with snapshots.I use for some testing those nested snapshots(testing different versions of some app), and i haven't found a reliable way to migrate or backup those snapshots.
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread ZFS mirror on 2x Crucial T705 (PCIe 5.0) causing txg_sync hangs under write load – no NVMe errors in dmesg.Yeah i have 2x these nvmes are depending on case and ventilation,they can go up to 90c and restart.
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread Storage for small clusters, any good solutions?.Usually i don't agree with that,because i've had customers on 3-node CEPH/Proxmox for more than 3-4 years without a hiccup (not counting power errors,etc). And nowadays, with proxmox it is everything batteries included, only thing admin needs to...
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread Network Optimization for High-Volume UDP Traffic in PVE.Usually i ask for netstat -sanu to see what can be optimized in kernel and system.
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread Storage for small clusters, any good solutions?.I don;t agree that the ceph learning curve is steep. Read the docs, get the right network(i would say everything else but this is primary),and start working with it. There are rarely problems, if we count out physical layer problems.
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread High latency on proxmox ceph cluster.Ooh, consumer crucial, not good, not good.
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread enable CONFIG_RUST for Proxmox kernel.But for now bcachefs works great with 6.17 kernel
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread Asymetric cluster with Ceph; best practise for quorum.Why are you putting those two nodes in the same cluster as those before? Why not just for starters, create them in separate clusters and work with that?
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread Shared Remote ZFS Storage.Why you have external help? When External Audit comes(Grant Thornton,KPMG etc etc) first they ask you is "what if you get hit by a bus", who will support that and that. That is why you need to have external maintenance contracts.
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Clarification request – SAN FC shared storage, Proxmox snapshots and Veeam backup compatibility.Ceph-replication,zfs-replication. Or just backup copying onto DRS site. What is RTO/RPO?
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread Simple concept for manual, short term use failover without significant downtime?.You mention failover, and in that regard, it makes sense to use Proxmox <> Proxmox pve-zsync replication. Both proxmoxes have zfs storage for vm and cts and you implement it on one machine. Failove then has moving .conf files and starting the...
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread ZFS 2.4.0 Special Device + Data VDEV Report Very Wrong Remaining Space.What is the use case for using zfs and disks in this way? This is not recommended way, if i have only two disks this way i would use bcachefs.
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread Simple concept for manual, short term use failover without significant downtime?.You are literally speaking about snapshot replication, by zfs or any other FS. So just setup pve-zsync to another machine and it's done.
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread Shared Remote ZFS Storage.Storage vendors can support anything they want,because you pay them to support it. But if you open a ticket with mdadm corruption, will they fix it?
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread 3 node cluster zfs & replication.1. Yes it is because you don't have shared storage for all your nodes, which is usually ceph. 2. There are some aftermarket scripts to replicate whole pool, but you usually want to replicate different machines with different schedules, eg dbs in...
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread Is it safe to use Proxmox VE (No-Subscription / Free) for small-scale production?.Yes,it is completely safe and usable.
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread Low perf IO VM Windows on Micron 7400.How are you testing inside windows for performance, and your windows vm configuration, which cpu type is it?
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread PVE 9.1.5 break NFS Mount Points to LXC (jellyfin)?.https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/proxmox-9-1-5-breaks-lxc-mount-points.180161/