ness1602's latest activity
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread PVE 9.1.5 break NFS Mount Points to LXC (jellyfin)?.https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/proxmox-9-1-5-breaks-lxc-mount-points.180161/
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread "Hybrid" pool understanding.just add test repo,there is zfs 2.4
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread Call for Evidence: Share your Proxmox experience on European Open Digital Ecosystems initiative (deadline: 3 February 2026).Even though I am in Europe not in EU, this is a great initiative. And I agree on Proxmox influence on virt services.
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.1 available!.ZFS 2.4 is in test atm. And it is working good at >5 machines atm.
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread Review appreciated/best practise: new pve environment with ceph.My recommendation is to use physical links to corosync, not vlan ones. As for the other things this is okay, all links should be active-passive in proxmox, so that you don't care if something dies ,and this is it. CEPH will work great in that...
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread Best architecture for running 50+ VDSs each with its own Proxmox VE on a large Dedicated Server (2 TB RAM).Then okay, give them one disk(ceph) for os and one for VM and that is that. No raid inside and other bs.
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread Best architecture for running 50+ VDSs each with its own Proxmox VE on a large Dedicated Server (2 TB RAM).All of this is okay, but how will you run ports passthrough?
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread Best architecture for running 50+ VDSs each with its own Proxmox VE on a large Dedicated Server (2 TB RAM).Yes, vm-1-hypervisor. Strange but okay if he got money for it. Why not?
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread Best architecture for running 50+ VDSs each with its own Proxmox VE on a large Dedicated Server (2 TB RAM).I mean it makes sense if you sell something like proxmox with 2-4cpus and 64gb of ram, so that you can spin 20 pms
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread Best architecture for running 50+ VDSs each with its own Proxmox VE on a large Dedicated Server (2 TB RAM).Okay you offer customers an hypervisor. It makes sense, not much but it does. I would always use CEPH for that.
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread Best architecture for running 50+ VDSs each with its own Proxmox VE on a large Dedicated Server (2 TB RAM).It is okay offering, i see there is financial reason for it. Unfortunately only nested proxmox is an option. But i cannot give you performance loss. Maybe install os on raid somewhere and add 2xnvme as passthrough for vmdata.
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread ZFS pool usage limits vs. available storage for dedicated LANcache VM.He is already using ssds for it's pool. You can add mirrors to mirrors ,effectively getting raid10.
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Weird RAID configurations for redundancy.Maybe in paranoid case you can go with raidz3, so that 3 disks can die? And set up spare .
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread VMFS equivalent in Proxmox? Shared iSCSI filesystem across multiple nodes.For stable cluster CEPH is the only way to go.
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread VMware user here.I've worked with a few companies who migrated huge load of RDSses so my recommendation is start with 3-node CEPH, 10g networking and work from that. Go up to let's say 10-15 nodes, then create new cluster. No problem with that.
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread Kernel 6.17 bug with megaraid-sas (HPE MR416).I circumvent that on supermicro with shutting down all vm and ct and then updating/upgrading everything. Try that.
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread Hardware requirements or recommendations for PDM ?.Usually with NMS or monitoring systems in big support companies, you have one machine outiside of everything(different power,switch and 3g modem usually) so that when anything or everything dies you get notifications etc. If you are maintaining...
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread RSTP on Switch with Proxmox.No,didnt need that on my end.
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread RSTP on Switch with Proxmox.here is how i do it in ex2200: ge-0/0/21 { description SP1-data; unit 0 { family ethernet-switching { interface-mode trunk; vlan { members [ Server-Vlan...
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread Opt-in Linux 6.17 Kernel for Proxmox VE 9 available on test & no-subscription.I had similar problem with megaraid_sas, the zfs 1 boot disks couldnt write to it if the machine load was high. Once i've shutdown the Vms on it, the kernel upgrade or proxmox-boot-tool would run okay. this was supermicro.