mouk's latest activity
-
Mmouk replied to the thread [SOLVED] resource pools, create vm, network bridge selection.Ah that works yes! Thanks @d.oishi! I still feel it would also be logical to simply add a network bridge (a resource, much like a storage) to a resource pool, to make it available inside a pool. Anyway: this works, thanks again!
-
Mmouk replied to the thread [SOLVED] resource pools, create vm, network bridge selection.ah right?! I did not know that... I will try and report back!
-
Mmouk replied to the thread [SOLVED] resource pools, create vm, network bridge selection.We're not using the SDN framework, but the 'old style' the bridges, but thanks for the suggestion, both!
-
Mmouk reacted to woma's post in the thread [SOLVED] resource pools, create vm, network bridge selection with
Like.
We use templates for VMs per resource pool, templates come with NICs defined including virtual bridges they connect to and allowed VLANs. These NICs can not be edited by users after they "full cloned" their VM out of that template. Tedious part... -
Mmouk posted the thread [SOLVED] resource pools, create vm, network bridge selection in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.Hi, Wondering about resource pools, and resource separation. In our PoC, I created some test resource pools, added users, VMs and some storages to them. Now, when creating a new VM (as a resource pool member) I see correctly the available...
-
Mmouk replied to the thread [FIXED] pve firewall seems to be bypassed..? VM port open, despite not opened in any pve firewall.Hi Stefan, Thanks for the quick follow-up! Looking at your requested output qm config 3346, I noticed it myself: firewall=1 was missing for the net0 device. After turning it on, the firewall started behaving as expected! Apologies and thanks!
-
Mmouk replied to the thread [FIXED] pve firewall seems to be bypassed..? VM port open, despite not opened in any pve firewall.Note: input policy is set to DROP, on both the DC and the VM level. I have now even created an explicit VM-level DROP-rule for port tcp/5403, and the behaviour has not changed. It seems the firewall rules don't apply for VMs in the same subnet as...
-
Mmouk posted the thread [FIXED] pve firewall seems to be bypassed..? VM port open, despite not opened in any pve firewall in Proxmox VE: Networking and Firewall.Hi, Trying to understand something. I created a VM for Qdevice , in the same /24 as my proxmox hypervisors: pve1: 192.168.33.44 pve2: 192.168.33.45 qdevice: 192.168.33.46 I understand from the docs that firewalling on the VM level should still...
-
Mmouk replied to the thread Proxmox Backup Server configuration , change listen address and port.Looking for the same...
-
Mmouk reacted to ceelight's post in the thread proxmox destroys working /etc/network/interfaces bond config with Like.
Just a quick one: We use the comment field for describing the interface (like Management, Ceph etc...).
-
Mmouk replied to the thread proxmox destroys working /etc/network/interfaces bond config.Yeah, we reverted now to doing that as well. But vmbr names are now nice and descriptive, and bonds are just numbered. It would be nice to eliminate that restriction.
-
Mmouk replied to the thread proxmox destroys working /etc/network/interfaces bond config.Great! I really hope the limitation will also be lifted for bridges! Thanks for the quick help! :-)
-
Mmouk replied to the thread proxmox destroys working /etc/network/interfaces bond config.Thanks for checking and confirming back. Ok, that's a pity, we would have liked to use meaningful names, including a VLAN identifier. We will have to use the comment field instead. Does the same limitation apply to vmbr? I notice those DO get...
-
Mmouk replied to the thread proxmox destroys working /etc/network/interfaces bond config.Yeah I added the bonds manually, not through the GUI. then later I edited something network through the GUI, and then all bond definitions were rewritten. (and broken, so after a reboot, the complete system was unreachable)
-
Mmouk posted the thread proxmox destroys working /etc/network/interfaces bond config in Proxmox VE: Networking and Firewall.Hi, To our surprise we see that proxmox rewrites (parts of) the network/interfaces file from this working version: auto MNGT_bond0 iface MNGT_bond0 inet manual bond-miimon 100 bond-mode 802.3ad bond-xmit-hash-policy layer3+4...
-
Mmouk replied to the thread tips for shared storage that 'has it all' :-).Thanks, I will.
-
Mmouk reacted to gurubert's post in the thread tips for shared storage that 'has it all' :-) with Like.
AFAIK NetApp has one of the fastest and most stable NFS server implementation in the industry. If you already have that I would definitely run some benchmarks on it.
-
Mmouk replied to the thread tips for shared storage that 'has it all' :-).Thanks for all valuable input provided. Much appreciated.
-
Mmouk reacted to brngates's post in the thread tips for shared storage that 'has it all' :-) with Like.
Netapp has some docs around using there arrays with proxmox: https://docs.netapp.com/us-en/netapp-solutions-virtualization/proxmox/index.html you're options are essentially NFS, SMB/CIFS, LVM+iSCSI LVM+NVMe over TCP, LVM+FC, or to come up with...
-
Mmouk reacted to alexskysilk's post in the thread tips for shared storage that 'has it all' :-) with Like.
Ceph is the only "all features" supported shared solution easily available for PVE. Its also the most heavily worked on for other Virt platforms such as XCP-NG and various flavors of kvm. Your decision tree going forward heavily depends on WHY...