Recent content by Menno

I need to plan and have some time to do the upgrade, it might take a little while before I'm able to do so.

Thanks! I'll see if I can upgrade one of our machines soon and report back once I have.

It seems pretty random, here are some logs from a few PVE nodes, the backup_1a datastore was only added yesterday and not in use yet. syslog.13.gz:Aug 19 21:26:25 pve01-dlf pvestatd[4266]: backup_vms: error fetching datastores - 401 Unauthorized syslog.18.gz:Aug 14 08:38:19 pve01-dlf...

Hi, We’re seeing quite a few (~10-20 a day) ‘401 Unauthorized’ messaged logged on 4 different clusters but it doesn’t seem to affect services. The PBS nodes would log messages such as: GET /api2/json/admin/datastore: 401 Unauthorized: [client [::ffff:172.18.xxx.xxx]:xxxxx] authentication...

Just wanted to add a 'me too' to the list, hopefully to help pinpoint the issue. We ran into this issue as well on our development cluster running from the no-subscription repository. For us the problem was reproducible with a snapshot rollback with memory, but only if our storage was on Ceph...

Thanks Stefan, just to update in case anyone else finds this useful, we've tested this on a Proxmox machine that had quite a few NUMA misses according to numastat but after enabling numa emulation in Proxmox for most of the VMs on it we did not see these misses go down. For now we've decided...

Hello, I'm experiencing many NUMA misses on a few of our Proxmox servers and reading the documentation[0] this might be resolved by enabling NUMA emulation for the VMs so the resources are properly distributed. Before changing all the VM configs I'd like to know if this is safe to do on...

No solution that I know of, we worked around it by turning off discard for the VM disks.

I'd very much like to know as well, I'm having this issue as well and am about to downgrade 10 nodes to Proxmox VE 5 because of this issue. Also dual ring configuration, one ring mtu 1500 and one mtu 9000.

I can confirm that with Proxmox VE 6.0, Ceph + KRBD and virtio disks with discard=on the issue remains. So to recap (please correct me if I'm wrong), when using PVE 5.4 and 6.0 with Ceph and KRBD turning on discard results in data loss in the VM regardless of the OS used and seems to be caused...

Thanks for the test case, testing it now to see if it's faster than my dd loop. The lack of response is bothering me as well though my initial report was somewhat incomplete but it seems many are using Ceph with librbd instead of KRBD, I was not able to reproduce the issue with librbd. I see...

Thanks, I've added myself to the bug report.

Are your virtual machines using scsi or virtio disks? Mine are scsi with a VirtIO controller so I can use discard but I'm currently testing with virtio disks to see if I can still trigger the issue, so far 24 hours without any issues. Do you have a way to (quickly) trigger the issue? Usually...

The issue is also present in qemu 4.0 (Proxmox 6.0). edit: changed the title of the topic as it doesn't seem to be related to the kernel.

An update regarding this issue, my initial findings were wrong as it was not the kernel update causing the issue but rather the update from qemu 2.12 to 3.0, but only because we're using Ceph with KRBD instead of librbd. I've tested qemu 3.0 with librbd for a week and the issue did not return...