keeka's latest activity

  • K
    keeka reacted to sterzy's post in the thread Docker integration with Like Like.
    Generally this causes issues between our use of Apparmor and other parts of our code base over and over again. So we heavily discourage it. However, with the release of Proxmox VE 9.1 you can use OCI templates for application containers on...
  • K
    We're proud to present the next iteration of our Proxmox Virtual Environment platform. This new version 9.1 is the first point release since our major update and is dedicated to refinement. This release is based on Debian 13.2 "Trixie" but we're...
  • K
    keeka replied to the thread Updates package origin.
    The version numbering (~deb13u1), whilst originating from the proxmox repo, was unusual in my experience. Thanks for the information.
  • K
    keeka reacted to janus57's post in the thread Updates package origin with Like Like.
    Hi, you have the information inside the changelog of the package : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1110177 Best regards,
  • K
    keeka reacted to leesteken's post in the thread Updates package origin with Like Like.
    There was an incompatibility, with the Debian version of systemd and something that Proxmox requires, and Debian does not do (non-security or feature) updates until the next major version. I cannot find the post from the Proxmox staff that...
  • K
    keeka replied to the thread Updates package origin.
    Why is, for example, the Debian package systemd available via the Proxmox repo? Also in this case it's newer than that on Debian repo. I have not encountered that before. Do I have misconfigured sources? ~# apt policy systemd systemd...
  • K
    Newer, Debian systemd and associated packages appear to be coming from the Proxmox repository.
    • Screenshot 2025-11-14 at 15-18-06 pve - Proxmox Virtual Environment.png
  • K
    keeka reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Proxmox Mail Gateway 9.0 released! with Like Like.
    We are pleased to announce the first stable release of Proxmox Mail Gateway 9.0 - immediately available for download! Twenty years after its first release, the new version of our email security solution is based on Debian 13.1 "Trixie", but...
  • K
    I have also seen this behaviour recently. I then noticed that changing the sidebar view mode results in the expected tag colours being applied.
  • K
    keeka reacted to mr44er's post in the thread Proxmox user base seems rather thin? with Like Like.
    Wouldn't hurt to warn others. Looks like overall newer revision of the card, I'm not familiar with. My Fujitsu-branded card has the electronic components arranged differently in the right-hand edge area. But anyway this rainbowshiny QC passed...
  • K
    Sure can. I'll also post the new one. I didn't take the pic of the new one though.
  • K
    That's good news. Thanks for the updates on your progress. Can you post images of the suspect card?
  • K
    Well, you have some great ideas, and thank you! But, get this...I just installed the i350 T4 card I ordered yesterday...and it works. It has different ICs than the other i350 T4. I'm going to look into the IC part numbers and see what I find. It...
  • K
    I will definitely post my results/process as I go through it. I've already compiled extensive notes, so good there.
  • K
    keeka reacted to Irit's post in the thread Spam Score GB_OBFU_PHONE with Like Like.
    These are the two patterns that trigger this rule: (A brief summary for a quicker overview) replace_tag NUM1 (?:\xf0\x9d\x9f\x8f|\xf0\x9d\x9f\xad) replace_tag NUM8 (?:\xf0\x9d\x9f\x96) replace_rules __GB_OBFU_PHONE body...
  • K
    As a newcomer to Linux and Linux-based virtualisation, your time might be better spent putting this network card issue aside for a while and sticking with PVE8. I have a similar network card in my setup, so was interested in your report. It's a...