keeka's latest activity
-
KMy only point here is that the term “snapshot” has different meanings, heavily depending on the contextual point-of-view: PVE VM snapshot This is the native Proxmox function. It freezes the current status of a VM. This state can be “unfrozen”...
-
Kkeeka replied to the thread PVE 9 apparmor errors.I switched to chrony at some point but I cannot remember if I was using systemd-timesyncd or full ntpd. Either way AIUI `apt install chrony` will warn about removal of a conflicting package. My preference would be for switching time daemon rather...
-
Kkeeka replied to the thread PVE 9 apparmor errors.IIRC older PVE installs may have had the full debian ntp package. Newer installations and guides recommend chrony.
-
KWe are excited to announce the release of Proxmox Mail Gateway 9.1! This release is based on Debian 13.5 "Trixie" and ships the Linux kernel 7.0 as the new stable default. It includes the latest versions of ZFS 2.4, PostgreSQL 17, SpamAssassin...
-
Kkeeka reacted to ChrisTG74's post in the thread Roll out "custom certificate" updates via shell / api? with
Like.
Oh, I found out that it already expects file-pathes for the cert and the key! So the docu and the inbuilt help texts are just wrong. I will update the bugreport -
Kkeeka replied to the thread is it possible to reject or quarantine spam based on conditions I set ?.If you want the ability to reject mail based on spam score, I believe you must enable 'before queue filtering'. As far as custom rules, there are quite a few examples on here. You define those in /etc/mail/spamassassin/custom.cf. You can also...
-
Kkeeka replied to the thread Migrating from read-only file system.Mount tmpfs on /var/log/pve/tasks? You may also need to specify an alternate, writetable `--tmpdir`.
-
Kkeeka replied to the thread ifupdown2 fun after upgrade.I have been burnt by this in the past when purging configuration from uninstalled packages (with ifupdown and grub-pc). I assumed common files were factored out in to some shared dependency but IIRC some configuration came from postinst scripts.
-
Kkeeka reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.2 available! with Like.
We are excited to announce the release of Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.2. This release focuses heavily on platform refinement, stability, and core optimization. Proxmox VE 9.2 is built on the robust Debian 13.5 "Trixie" and ships with Linux...
-
Kkeeka reacted to fiona's post in the thread After proxmox updates: Random segmentation faults in AlmaLinux 8 VMs on Proxmox VE 9.1 with Like.
There was no change. We always picked up QEMU releases as they came in, moving them along to pve-test and pve-no-subscription before a Proxmox VE point release made them available in the enterprise repository as well. Also, QEMU does not have a...
-
Kkeeka replied to the thread Is it possible to keep one VM running while updating Proxmox VE from 8 to 9?.I am in a similar situation. I have a spare router but I've not needed it. Having no PVE storage on the system disk makes for a simple image of the entire system disk (<5GB) for peace of mind. Then apt update && apt dist-upgrade Modify apt...
-
Kkeeka reacted to Rayd123's post in the thread 7.0.2-2-pve breaks Graylog due to MongoDB on an LXC. with Like.
Hi everyone, Just a heads-up for those running MongoDB (specifically version 8.0.21) inside LXC containers on the latest Proxmox 9.x updates. During my Sunday maintenance window, I updated to Kernel 7.0.2-2-pve. After the reboot, my Graylog...
-
Kkeeka reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Proxmox (as a company) - what the HELL are you doing? Kernel update to 7 broke networking IN A VM with Like.
Instead of complaining and just rejecting any responsibility for your own actions of installing an opt-in kernel marked as experimental, that was moved to no-subscriptions to make it easier to test without pulling in other updates for less...
-
Kkeeka replied to the thread 203.30.8.0/21 is listed on the Policy Block List (PBL).In these instances, where some MTA declines to relay a sender's message because the recipient domain fails some PBL/RBL query, I wonder if that MTA: sends an SMTP reject/fail response during the initial transaction. sends a failed delivery...
-
Kkeeka replied to the thread 203.30.8.0/21 is listed on the Policy Block List (PBL).How many do that I wonder? To refuse to deliver an email because the receiving domain's MX is on a PBL (or other BL for that matter) doesn't seem inline with intended use of blocklists.