jsterr's latest activity
-
-
jsterr replied to the thread Questions about the dynamic CRS.Hallo Daniel! Done https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=7893 https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6593 (this ones already existing but also useful) https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6960 (already existed, commented on...
-
jsterr reacted to aaron's post in the thread Feedback on the bulk-restart feature of ceph (9.2.5) with
Like.
@jsterr please add/create a bug/enhancement request over at https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/ Thanks! -
jsterr posted the thread Feedback on the bulk-restart feature of ceph (9.2.5) in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.Hello Kefu Chai (does he have a account here @aaron ?) Nice addition of having a bulk-restart feature in ceph when using 9.2.5 :-) It worked really well on mons, mgr, osds and mds. I also used it in a test-setup for trying a ceph 19 to 20...
-
-
Generally, these sound like good ideas! Feel free to create separate Bugzilla entries for the separate issues: automatically add new guests as HA resources by enabling some cluster-wide check (Though new guests can be automatically added...
-
jsterr replied to the thread Questions about the dynamic CRS.Hi Daniel! Some cases that do not work or might be cool adding them: Example 1: A resource affinity rule with “Keep Separate” for VM1 and VM2, combined with an HA node affinity rule (without “Strict”) on node1 and node2 (checked), but not...
-
-
Hi, sorry for the late reply! At least for two rooms this is already possible with non-strict node affinity rules as these will fallback to the other available cluster nodes if none of the specified nodes are available anymore. However, an HA...
-
A few notes based on our experience with NVMe/TCP and PVE: Your performance expectation should come from your storage stack, not your choice of protocol. The transport is usually not the bottleneck in setups like this. If you're seeing latencies...
-
jsterr replied to the thread Proxmox VE Ceph Benchmark 2023/12 - Fast SSDs and network speeds in a Proxmox VE Ceph Reef cluster.Full meshed with sdn fabric (openfabric) is the way to go. See the 9.0 Release Video for a quick introduction.
-
Hey! just sharing my two cents here of what I have tried so far. nvme-cli vs nvme-stas: We recently had this conversation with a customer. First we configured it with nvme-cli natively, but this turned out to be rather complex. It works, but...
-
jsterr reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Kernel 6.17 - End of Support after July with Like.
Hello, Given that ubuntu upstream is in process of phasing this kernel out, and we're already now spending considerable amount of engineering time to handled backporting (security) fixes on top of upstreams work, we decided to go through with...
-
Hello Community, im currently in the progress of trying out nvme over tcp in Proxmox VE and wanted to ask, if somebody has ressources for: * Basic Setup of NVMe-Over-TCP in Proxmox VE? * Information about using basic nvme-cli vs nvme-stas ->...
-
jsterr replied to the thread [SOLVED] Is a vzdump backupjob on a slow nfs-server able to trigger watchdog.The customer also asked the proxmox enterprise support and proxmox also thinks that stalled i/o caused the issue. The solution could be using a fleecing storage. Thanks for your (also correct :) ) replies.
-
jsterr reacted to Sim0n's post in the thread [SOLVED] Is a vzdump backupjob on a slow nfs-server able to trigger watchdog with Like.
Maybe the the IO-Wait gets so high that corosync drops out or the Watchdog gets triggered? You could try to set a bandwidth limit in the backup job or a fleecing storage?
-
jsterr replied to the thread [SOLVED] Is a vzdump backupjob on a slow nfs-server able to trigger watchdog.Nope corosync has its own two links with their own two physical ports not used for backup.
-
jsterr posted the thread [SOLVED] Is a vzdump backupjob on a slow nfs-server able to trigger watchdog in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.Hello Proxmox Forum, Is a slow vzdump backupjob able to trigger watchdog? I had some unknown reboot today at 07:38 on a customers system: - 07:35:34 vzdump-Start (Ziel: langsames NFS) - 07:38:24 pve-ha-crm: loop took too long (33s) - 07:38:36...
-
jsterr reacted to Francois Baillargeon's post in the thread Switching between i440fx and q35 with Like.
It may be related to TPM requirements of modern Windows such as Windows 11 that are not supported on 440fx.
-
jsterr replied to the thread Switching between i440fx and q35.Windows OS-Selection in the vm wizard defaults to q35 so changing it might bring some benefits in performance even though your not using pci-pt?
-
jsterr reacted to Francois Baillargeon's post in the thread Switching between i440fx and q35 with Like.
Normally it will trigger a licensing change as it's lots of changing hardware, but I might be mistaken. Why do you need to change otherwise? All it mostly does is expose PCIe so you can assign PCIe devices directly (like a GPU etc) You can...
-
jsterr posted the thread Switching between i440fx and q35 in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.Hey Proxmox-Community, is Switching between i440fx and q35 ok? -> can it cause some issues with booting or licencing on windows? Any known issues or things I should know about switching between those on a already installed machine? Thanks Jonas
