jsterr's latest activity
-
jsterr reacted to leesteken's post in the thread [SOLVED] kernel update fail 6.14 to 7.0 no space left on device with
Like.
Don't run 'apt upgrade' as it might not pull in all dependencies; use the official instructions instead: https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/pve-admin-guide.html#system_software_updates And here is a (another) recent thread where the same problem... -
jsterr replied to the thread [SOLVED] kernel update fail 6.14 to 7.0 no space left on device.what about proxmox-boot-tool kernel remove? root@pveneo:~# proxmox-boot-tool kernel E: subcommand is mandatory for 'kernel'. /usr/sbin/proxmox-boot-tool kernel <add|remove> <kernel-version> /usr/sbin/proxmox-boot-tool kernel pin...
-
jsterr replied to the thread [SOLVED] kernel update fail 6.14 to 7.0 no space left on device.is a apt autoremove not enough to fix this? did the job on my site a few weeks ago.
-
jsterr reacted to fabian's post in the thread Cluster not quorate - extending auth key lifetime! with Like.
could you double check and post your network configuration/setup, including the switch config? in particular of the two "problematic" nodes? this looks like a network misconfiguration problem, though the logs don't give a clear indication *what*...
-
jsterr reacted to gyptazy's post in the thread Der Proxday 2026 in Deutschland, Mönchengladbach with Like.
Hey zusammen, gerne möchte ich (einige kennen mich sicherlich bereits von ProxLB, PegaProx und den Ansible Modulen für PVE) euch auf das Community-Event Proxday 2026 aufmerksam machen, der von der credativ GmbH veranstaltet wird. Das Konzept ist...
-
jsterr reacted to THE_BIG_ONE's post in the thread Q35 v11.0 causes extreme corruption on many VMs Linux/BSD/Windows (STOP 0x8007025d) with Like.
I have performed 6 successful installs across 5 different Proxmox PCs with this morning's pve-qemu-kvm v11.0.0-3 using qcow2 with SSD + Trim/Discard enabled and no seen issues. I am currently now performing 3x in-place repair / upgrades across 3x...
-
jsterr replied to the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.2 available!.Thanks! Been seeing the features the last two weeks already, now they are official! Thanks for your work - love the new load balancing!
-
jsterr reacted to Neobin's post in the thread QEMU 11.0 available on pve-test and pve-no-subscription as of now with Like.
A patch: [1], thanks to @fiona, to "disable cet-ibt and cet-ss flags for modern Windows by default" is in qemu-server 9.1.12: [2], which already is available in pve-no-subscription. [1]...
-
jsterr replied to the thread [SOLVED] Adding new PCIe card prevents boot..But thats only for having issues starting a vm on a different node. Im asking because if you add another pci card to a current node. the previous id of the card might change and vm wont boot then?
-
jsterr replied to the thread [SOLVED] Adding new PCIe card prevents boot..Hello Dunuin is this information still valid in 2026? So cards get renamed when adding another pci card, so vm might or cause trouble? is there something like "networking"-pinning for pci-devices that are not network-cards?
-
I'll answer both questions in one, because they're quite related: The scheduling mode (basic, static-load, dynamic-load) specifies which measure is used to compare nodes and HA resources against each other: For the basic mode, it's simply how...
-
jsterr replied to the thread Questions about the dynamic CRS.I might have missed it, but can you explain the difference between static and dynamic load-balancing regarding the new rebalancing feature? I cant find it in the mailing-list or current docs?
-
jsterr reacted to uzumo's post in the thread The Reasons for poor performance of Windows when the CPU type is host with Like.
Up to Qemu 11, the only option is “Disabled.” Without hardware acceleration, performance will likely drop significantly. https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/qemu-10-1-available-on-pve-test-and-pve-no-subscription-as-of-now.175350/post-850543 The...
-
jsterr replied to the thread The Reasons for poor performance of Windows when the CPU type is host.Im not much into windows and do not have a vm currently available, does someone have a comparision between Windows-VM with Host and nested-virt "on" or "+" VS Windows-VM with Host but nested-virt disabled "-"? If not I will do some testing in the...
-
It depends, and it depends what you look at in the Proxmox web GUI. Total and Host Memory Usage are now at least 100% in the graphs for VMs with passthrough. The Used (and the Memory usage bar at the top) depends on what the ballooning driver...
-
jsterr replied to the thread MEMORY PROXMOX 9.0.Thanks! Pinned to actual host-ram means the vm also uses 100% on vm-summary? Or is it "only" reserved on host summary, so vm could theoretically only show 50% memory usage, although it reserves 100% on hypervisor-level?
-
PCI(e) passthrough requires all VM memory (which can be a little over 100%) to be pinned into actual host RAM (due to device DMA). Ballooning cannot give memory back to the Proxmox host, but the ballooning device can (for some operating systems)...
-
jsterr replied to the thread MEMORY PROXMOX 9.0.Hello Impact. Do you know if Balloon = 1 is ok, when memory max and min memory have the same value (so no actual "ballooning" is done) regarding PCI-PT? https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Dynamic_Memory_Management#Ballooning says Ballooning should...
-
jsterr replied to the thread Questions about the dynamic CRS.Thanks! Done: https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=7557
-
Yes, good idea! We already thought about this during development, though we were focusing on the core feature first. Feel free to create a Bugzilla entry [0] for this in the mean time, though as this is relatively trivial to implement and as you...