Recent content by jompsi

Instead of a vlan I should use an independent network for corosync. Corosync communicates over the ring0_addr addresses, if I am right. I will consider your inputs for the future. I am not sure yet, how I will solve it, but at least now all three nodes are online again and I know I have to take...

I have executed the longer running omping which has 0% loss: omping -c 600 -i 1 -q 10.200.1.20 10.200.1.21 10.200.1.22 10.200.1.20 : waiting for response msg 10.200.1.21 : waiting for response msg 10.200.1.20 : joined (S,G) = (*, 232.43.211.234), pinging 10.200.1.21 : joined (S,G) = (*...

Good morning Stoiko I have done everything you told me. For the results see below. During these steps I realized in the journal for the pve-cluste on node3 there were only entries from 23.12.2018. So I checked the service, which was running, but I than restarted it: root@drax:/etc# service...

Hi Stoiko I have no storage replication. I only have some NFS storages for backing up the VMs. All the VMs are running on local storage on the nodes. storage.cfg: dir: local path /var/lib/vz content iso,backup,vztmpl lvmthin: local-lvm thinpool data vgname pve...

Hi all I have a three node cluster. In the web gui of node1 and node2, node3 is shown as offline, while the web gui of node3 shows node1 and node2 offline. daemon.log of node3: Jan 8 11:49:00 drax systemd[1]: Starting Proxmox VE replication runner... Jan 8 11:49:02 drax pvesr[12250]: trying...

Hi all At the moment I have a two node proxmox 5.2-10 cluster. In a few weeks I get a new server and than this will become a three node cluster. Now I have a problem with the status query from NFS shares. Some work and others dont. In the proxmox GUI I get for two NFS shares a question mark...

Switches support LACP and will be configured. We have no VLANs, so I think I will stay with bonding type 4(LACP). As hash policy I use layer2+3 as recommended in this book: https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/mastering-proxmox-third-edition Thanks for your tips. I...

Hi all I have a question about creating a cluster. We use two servers, which have each four 1GB NICs. We work with local storage. The most importent VMs are Actice Directory und fileserver. These VMs are redundant. AD1 is on hypervisor1 and AD2 is on hypervisor2. Now I just wanted to make a...

Hi all, I have made my harddisk to a LVM like this https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Storage_Model#LVM_Groups_with_Local_Backing and my VMs feel faster now. At the moment I dont have time to make performance tests between directory storage and LVM, but it feels faster and I will do it when I have...

Hello @udo The disk has multiple partition: fdisk -l /dev/sdb Disk /dev/sdb: 2000.4 GB, 2000398934016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243201 cylinders, total 3907029168 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes I/O size...

Hi all First of all, thanks for all your inputs. @udo I was mistaken. I do not use a raid 1. So nothing is configured. I did the pveperf on sdb9. It is in my second post the second code section. What kind of sata disk do you use? It is in my case just for a testlab. And is this local...

EDIT: I found out which HDD is built in. It is a Seagate ST2000VN000. When I bought it, clearly didnt look at performance and till then i never made bad experience. What kind of HDD should be used in virtualization envirnments? My mainboard is AsRock H97 Pro4 which supports Sata 3.