Recent content by jaxx

plus one'd ! Thanks :)

Hi, Unless I've totally missed it, or there's a trick to do such a thing, I'd have a little wish for a little enhancement on pool based backup: by allowing multiple pools being selected in a job (or excluded for an inverted effect, as you can do with the "include/exclude VM") Today, when we...

Hi ! I'm having a bit of a pickle on starting a fairly horrible VM (because it's Windows). It has 3 disks and a GPU passthrough. I have a local NVMe Drive and a fairly good CEPH pool on this little cluster (18 spinners with NVMe WAL/journal and 2x10Gb loop) It manages to start (sometimes) if...

Hi all ! I'm hitting a kernel bug, possibly linked to ceph(/cephfs) that doesn't exactly look like other threads I've come across and would like to get some help :) Setup is: Three servers, two have OSDs for ceph (I know, we'll get another one one day, third (more dev and local nvme for...

Well... I have a few containers with sub mounted MPs to the cephfs inside ... cut the little traffic there was to be safe and umount worked a charm even without stopping the containers (but yeah, I'll plan a reboot anyways)

#facepalm I would have thought disabling and re-enabling the share would have naturally taken care of the mount. # mount | grep cephfs 10.137.99.1,10.137.99.10,10.137.99.2:/ on /mnt/pve/cephfs type ceph (rw,relatime,name=admin,secret=<hidden>,acl) # umount /mnt/pve/cephfs # mount | grep cephfs...

Hi all ! I've been moving servers around (adding a new and removing one that was 'too far' network wise, waaaay better btw for those who know :) ) I've removed a node that had OSDs, the whole bang, and accounted as a mon and before that added a server with the same setup, acting as a mon as...

Well, the initial plan was one node in GRA RBX and SBG, we were hitting the hurdle with SBG being too far (11ms, OVH's smokeping ( http://sbg1-sbg.smokeping.ovh.net/smokeping?target=OVH.DCs.RBX ) is on par with the latencies we see on the vRack network), so we'll be regrouping to GRA+RBX, one...

I actually have that page open since a while :) We're gonna order closer nodes... two same DC ones (<0.2ms), third and worst one would be at ~2ms away... though that one might end up being a mirror of some sort if it remains suboptimal, it's just not what we were hoping for (cephfs mountpoints...

I, basically, know, I just never had to worry about that until recently... I was merely asking if there where any crush rules or setting that would allow to have it ack writes with once it arrives to the primary OSD (letting it replicate in background to the remaining OSDs) and if it were...

Hi all, I'm having what seems to be a network nottleneck. Context is: one of my clients wants to revamp it's infrastructure and was happy already with PVE servers despite having only local zfs backed images, missing out on the broad possibilities offered by Ceph... I wanted to push him to go...

Well... explicit bridge-vids on vmbr410 did the trick :facepalm: Thanks ! I guess holidays weren't long enough JB./.

Yeah, It was a perfectly working solution with ifupdown1… Already beer-time here, but I’ll scroll my terminals tomorrow, bridge vlan dev bridge10 showed the three vlans as expected if I remember well, i don’t remember for vmbr410 which was holding the tagged CTs/VMs, I’ll give it a shot… I...

Side note: It isn't PVE7 generating the issue (nor a too recent kernel) but ifupdown2 that isn't creating bridges exactly the same way, it wasn't installed (or needed) before ... in the upgrade path, I include now ifupdown2 to be installed, and the issue arises even on a PVE6 with ifupdown2. I...

Oh, cr*p ... I have >60 VM/CTs on the cluster (and a couple of /23 and a handful of /24s) for half a dozen clients, that's why my numbering scheme is vast ... it hopefully hinders only hotplugging, because I don't feel like renumbering everything :) Errrm... bridge10.410 is created fine, so...