IsThisThingOn's latest activity
-
IIsThisThingOn reacted to meyergru's post in the thread [Community project] Proximo — an open-source, least-privilege MCP/API layer for managing PVE with an AI agent (feedback wanted) with
Like.
Thanks for sharing your project here. I appreciate that you openly state this is a human+AI hybrid project. However, looking closely at the concept, the GitHub profile, and the architectural choice, I see three potential scenarios here—all of... -
IIsThisThingOn reacted to Johannes S's post in the thread [Community project] Proximo — an open-source, least-privilege MCP/API layer for managing PVE with an AI agent (feedback wanted) with Like.
I'm not interested in using an AI agent at all on my hosts because my data is too important for me: https://www.euronews.com/next/2026/04/28/an-ai-agent-deleted-a-companys-entire-database-in-9-seconds-then-wrote-an-apology In other words: I...
-
IIsThisThingOn reacted to wattaburger's post in the thread How to access VM's from anywhere with Like.
TY
-
IIsThisThingOn replied to the thread How to access VM's from anywhere.for Windows, the simplest route is probably a WireGuard VPN on your router. If your router is unable to do WireGuard, fire up a Debian VM and install WireGuard there. If your ISP is too stupid for IPv6, I hope for you that you at least don't...
-
IIsThisThingOn replied to the thread How to access VM's from anywhere.Depends on what VM you want to reach, how and why. For a Linux VM, the probably simplest solution is to configure sshd to accept no passwords, open up the port 22 to your static IPv6 of that Linux VM (that is assuming your ISP is not a total...
-
IVielleicht übersehe ich ja etwas, aber „clientlos“ wird es eher nicht gehen, „agentlos“ aber schon. ;-) Warum nicht einfach ein Tool wie Uptime Kuma nutzen? Das Tool kann ICMP-, HTTP- und noch einige andere Checks durchführen und funktioniert...
-
IIch in Form von managed und unmanaged Switches ohne Layer3. :D Das reicht mir nämlich hier in meinem Heim-Netzwerk. :) Wenn es dann eher um ein größeres Netzwerk und nicht um "Spielerei" zu Hause gehen sollte, dann könnte man auch sagen/fragen...
-
IWillst du die Route auf Veränderungen überwachen, oder willst du wissen, ob der Server erreichbar ist? Das ist ein Einzeiler: ~$ export SERVER=irgendeinserver; while true; do echo -n "$(date) "; ping -c 1 -q -W 2 "$SERVER" &>/dev/null &&...
-
IIsThisThingOn replied to the thread Überwachen ob ein VM lebt..https://uptimekuma.org/
-
IIsThisThingOn replied to the thread Nonsensical behaviour from zfs.Just to be clear, you don't encrypt the source pool and then just pull ZFS snapshots to your encrypted backup pool and want encryption there, right? Because simply encrypting on the source would be easier otherwise. ZFS is a server filesystem...
-
IIsThisThingOn replied to the thread Proxmox with zfs disk moinitoring.If you have configured email notifications, you will get SMART errors. I am not 100% sure if you also get ZFS and scrub errors by default, but I guess that is the case.
-
IIsThisThingOn replied to the thread Proxmox Backup Server caused a IP blacklisting from Spamhaus.org??.What makes you think, that PBS sending mails to one single e-mail address would trigger an IP block on spamhaus.org? Where? On spamhaus.org? Did you do that?
-
IIsThisThingOn reacted to mow's post in the thread PBS testimonial (hardware requirements are a joke) with Like.
ext4 on raid5 on a P420i with 1GB FBWC, which essentially acts as PLP for HDDs, is fine too. The cache is big enough to hold the metadata, and all the atime updates during a GC run will be caught by the cache, and eventually written in bulk.
-
IraidZ1 is known to not be good for IOPS: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/fabu-can-i-use-zfs-raidz-for-my-vms.159923/ . And your drives might be consumer drives without =1&c[nodes][0]=16&o=date']PLP. Lots of threads about disappointing (write)...
-
IIsThisThingOn reacted to andretona's post in the thread [SOLVED] Need help with my ZFS pool with Like.
Thanks everyone for helping me with this problem. I decided to move all data to another pool (no SMR drive) and remove those drives from the server. I will mark this as Solved.
-
IIsThisThingOn reacted to UdoB's post in the thread PBS testimonial (hardware requirements are a joke) with Like.
Just as a bad designed example: one single pool, RaidZ2, three devices for the Special Device because two were not stable - and one being attached by USB. Again: bad design. What I can see here is this: root@pvec:~# zpool iostat -v 5...
-
IIsThisThingOn reacted to UdoB's post in the thread PBS testimonial (hardware requirements are a joke) with Like.
Seems so; it's great that it works fine for you! That's why I very often emphasize "my context"... :-)
-
IIsThisThingOn replied to the thread [SOLVED] Need help with my ZFS pool.Do you expect a connection error and not the probably very old 2TB WD red drive? VRPF failed, right? You pulled it out and inserted the 9TN2, right? BTW don't do that if you have enough bays. Just insert the new drive and let the resilver do...
-
IIsThisThingOn reacted to UdoB's post in the thread PBS testimonial (hardware requirements are a joke) with Like.
PBS does really, really do random writes. It needs IOPS - as many as it can get. For ZFS there is the rising problem of fragmentation of the free space --> it is not guaranteed that a single 2-4 MB chunk can be written sequentially at one...
-
IIsThisThingOn replied to the thread PBS testimonial (hardware requirements are a joke).Not what I am seeing in the real world. Let's start with a fresh VM where nothing is already backed up: zpool iostat poolBackup 1 capacity operations bandwidth pool alloc free read write read write...