Recent content by inno-forum

yes

I am trying to do a backup of 4 VMs every 5 minutes. I see this in a log. INFO: starting new backup job: vzdump 149 150 139 158 --mode snapshot --fleecing 0 --quiet 1 --prune-backups 'keep-daily=14,keep-monthly=1' --notes-template '{{guestname}}' --mailnotification always --storage BACKUP...

We think the problem was the switch. We changed the switch and now it seems to work normally. We'll test it and I'll let you know if anything doesn't work. Thanks for your help. I have another question. We were using nfs v4. I read that nfs v3 will be better for our configuration.(HDD etc)...

Durch die Anpassung von Squash am Synology hat dann geklappt. Ich habe dazu in Synology den Eigentümer für Backup Ordner als admin Rekursiv verteilt und Squash "alle Benutzer zu admin."

Sorry the Swap is on PVE Hosts. PVE 1 -> RAM usage 58.96% (148.20 GiB of 251.35 GiB) SWAP usage 0.01% (512.00 KiB of 8.00 GiB) PVE 2 -> RAM usage 58.69% (147.51 GiB of 251.35 GiB) SWAP usage 10.98% (899.50 MiB of 8.00 GiB) PVE 4 -> RAM usage 70.50% (88.41 GiB...

previously started every 10 minutes and always was fine. Synchronisation will be started when the backups are completed. ( about 02:30) Logs are attached. We stopped the synchronisation because it takes too long. For 1 snapshot from 02:54 to 11:11. The synchronised backup was done on Sunday...

We have a problem with our current backup(PBS-3.3.3-1). We used to backup to two different Proxmox. This worked fine despite the dirty bitmap. After updating to 3.3 with the feature (backup: stat known chunks on backup finish) the problems started. Everything took so long that we could no...

Will a full backup be performed after a dirty bitmap? For example 60 GB VM First Backup take 3 Minutes INFO: scsi0: dirty-bitmap status: existing bitmap was invalid and has been cleared INFO: backup is sparse: 15.51 GiB (25%) total zero data INFO: backup was done incrementally, reused 15.71...

Will a downgrade or a new PBS with old version help?

Do you have any plans in this regard? Is the project still going ahead?

Konfiguration (sehe Bild ) Storage mit jeweils 2x 10 G/bit Ports. (Bond ist eingerichtet) Proxmox mit jeweils 2x 10 G/bit Ports. (Bond ist eingerichtet) Je Port geht zu einem eigenen Switch. Switch sind zwei Strecken (STP) verbunden. Proxmox zwischen 8:00 -08:30 CPU ca. 23 % zwischen 8:00...

Wir bekommen in der letzten Zeit weitere Fehler. Die Storages sind nicht überlastet und man merkt keine Performance Problem. Das Problem ist, dass "directory '/mnt/pve/xxx-NAS' does not exist or is unreachable" Fehler passiert und ab und zu die VMs sich neu starten. (Windows Logs) Anbei ein...

Thanks! could you tell me where you see that the bug is fixed? in the list I see Pending (6.8.0-7.7) and Released (6.8~rc2) but 6.8 rc2 is not installed on proxmox. @shanreich

https://www.proxmox.com/en/proxmox-virtual-environment/features -> "Proxmox Virtual Environment is based on Debian GNU/Linux and uses a custom Linux Kernel"

Proxmox (8.2) is based on Debian bookworm, according to the Debian documentation the bug has been fixed in the bookworm 6.1.76-1 kernel. bookworm (security) 6.1.90-1. (https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-1086) I noticed that in our infrastructure Proxmox has kernel...