Gilberto Ferreira's latest activity
-
GGilberto Ferreira replied to the thread PVE VM replication standalone host to 3 node PVE cluster with CEPH shared storage.Perhaps you sould take a look in PVE-Zsync. One doesn't need to have the node in cluster, I guess. https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/PVE-zsync Just an idea.
-
GGilberto Ferreira reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment now available for 64-bit ARM (arm64)! with
Like.
Thanks for your feedback. FWIW, Ubuntu VMs run fine on our 144-core NVIDIA Grace system, but yeah, that's an ARMv9. We still can improve compat if it's cheap to do, or maybe just some config options needs changing. Can you please open a new... -
GGilberto Ferreira reacted to geerlingguy's post in the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment now available for 64-bit ARM (arm64)! with Like.
Just got it loaded up on my Ampere Altra Max 128-core system, and install was a breeze. Once I had it running, I tried creating an Ubuntu 24.04.1 arm64 server VM, and the process was going through fine... but at a certain point when the Ubuntu...
-
GGilberto Ferreira replied to the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment now available for 64-bit ARM (arm64)!.This an excelent news... It's just show how owesome Proxmox is... Go go Proxmox... :)
-
GGilberto Ferreira reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment now available for 64-bit ARM (arm64)! with Like.
We are excited to announce the first release of Proxmox Virtual Environment with official support for a second CPU architecture: 64-bit ARM (arm64/aarch64). Until now, Proxmox VE was available for x86-64 (amd64) only. Proxmox VE 9.2 for arm64...
-
GGilberto Ferreira replied to the thread Migration from VMware.Starwind has a nice tools as well... https://www.starwindsoftware.com/starwind-v2v-converter I never used, but got friends that did it... I rather use clonezilla or redorescue as I pointed out... Redorescue always work for me... But, go ahead...
-
GI have licensed tools that normaly is used for baremetal recovery. I will take a look at other such options, if i cant get this simple option working.
-
GGilberto Ferreira replied to the thread Migration from VMware.Try http://redorescue.com/ Works 100% for me. And, first, remove vmware tools, if installed.!
-
GGilberto Ferreira replied to the thread Problem with PVE 8.1 and OCFS2 shared storage with io_uring.yeah... that's what I am doing since use ocfs2 for the first time. Thanks for the advice.
-
GGilberto Ferreira reacted to spacefreak's post in the thread Problem with PVE 8.1 and OCFS2 shared storage with io_uring with Like.
Please be aware that cache=writeback may lead to data loss in case of a power failure. It also works if you set cache=none and aio=native, but I ran into issues (BTRFS metadata corruptions) within VMs. Currently, I am using cache=none and...
-
GGilberto Ferreira replied to the thread Problem with PVE 8.1 and OCFS2 shared storage with io_uring.Oh! My mistake! I just set cache = none and get those nasty errors. Put cache = writeback and it's work fine. Sorry
-
-
GGilberto Ferreira replied to the thread Problem with PVE 8.1 and OCFS2 shared storage with io_uring.But I used the writeback cache in the Proxmox 8.4 as well I got bugged! So, still, I can't explain why works on newest version of kernel and PVE. Anyway... It's works.... That what's matter.
-
GGilberto Ferreira reacted to spacefreak's post in the thread Problem with PVE 8.1 and OCFS2 shared storage with io_uring with Like.
Thanks for your reply @Gilberto Ferreira . The difference to my setup is your cache setting (writeback) which does not use O_DIRECT semantics and therefore does not trigger the bug.
-
GGilberto Ferreira replied to the thread Problem with PVE 8.1 and OCFS2 shared storage with io_uring.Or perhaps, this is has to do with new QEMU? We need some expert explanation here.
-
GGilberto Ferreira replied to the thread Problem with PVE 8.1 and OCFS2 shared storage with io_uring.just to validate this process, I create a 2 node cluster with Proxmox VE 8.4.19 and with the very same storage, created with Debian 13 and TargetCLI. Now I got that error: With Proxmox VE 9 and newer kernels, no error so far, at least here for...
-
-
GGilberto Ferreira replied to the thread Problem with PVE 8.1 and OCFS2 shared storage with io_uring.So... I went ahead and create a quick and simple target iscsi with Debian and targetcli. I've created the backstore, target and luns with sinble IP. After that, I create the device in proxmox with: iscsiadm -m discovery -t st -p 172.18.100.120...
-
GGilberto Ferreira replied to the thread [SOLVED] Resize Ubuntu VM disk.In your case, or better, in any case, it's needs to use growpart first. Before use it, perhaps is need to install cloud-guest-utils
-
GGilberto Ferreira replied to the thread pve 9.2 fails to install.Try to append this options in the grub: pcie_aspm=off intel_iommu=off intel_idle.max_cstate=0 acpi_power_meter=off nomodeset This options has save me for a lot of issue. pcie_aspm=off What it does: Disables Active State Power Management for...
-
GGilberto Ferreira replied to the thread Problem with PVE 8.1 and OCFS2 shared storage with io_uring.I am using the very same kernel version, updated today, 07-06-2026. Proxmox VE 9.2.4, 2-nodes. Perhaps I don't have had the issue because the storage underlying is DRBD 9 dual-primary + pacemaker + dlm + ocfs2? I really don't know!
-
GGilberto Ferreira reacted to spacefreak's post in the thread Problem with PVE 8.1 and OCFS2 shared storage with io_uring with Like.
@Gilberto Ferreira I just tested it with the current Proxmox kernel 7.0.14-3 and the problem still persists on my system. Which kernel version do you have and what are your VM disk options if I may ask?
