Recent content by geos_one

leider gibt es aktuelle problem mit os/2 und kvm. nur virtualbox vmware umd microsft desktop vm schaffen das laut anleitung von arcaos also muss ich wohl schauen wie ich virtualbox headless zum proxmox dazu kriege. und es nicht zu problemen mit dem netzwerken kommt.

Für OS/2 oder ArcaOS damit es läuft darf im system kein SCSI controller vorhanden sien das bringt das system komplett durcheinander. https://www.arcanoae.com/wiki/arcaos/installation-planning/virtual-machine-configuration/ mfg Mario

dasw wäre mein ausweg werd ich in ien paar tagen probieren.

Irgendiwe schaffe ich es nicht die richtige konfiguration für den Container zu setzen dam er zugriff auf /dev/kvm hat. der grund dafür ist das dosemu2 /dev/kvm nutzt um einen ibm computer mit 4mhz zu simulieren .... bin gerade am setup eines BBS mit doorgames aber die kvm zugriff kriege ich...

the Proxmox setup ist pve 7.4 newest version. balloon: 0 boot: order=sata1 cores: 1 cpu: pentium3,flags=-pcid;-spec-ctrl;-ssbd;-ibpb;-virt-ssbd;-amd-ssbd;-amd-no-ssb;-hv-tlbflush;-hv-evmcs;-aes cpuunits: 2048 hotplug: 0 kvm: 1 memory: 4096 meta: creation-qemu=6.2.0,ctime=1668728811 name...

no not working at the moment i got distracted by other problem. but it still needs to be solved

i recheckt the config it,s the same <28>Feb 16 12:43:47 pro-pve01-p corosync[12012]: [TOTEM ] JOIN or LEAVE message was thrown away during flush operation. <28>Feb 16 12:43:47 pro-pve01-p corosync[12012]: [TOTEM ] JOIN or LEAVE message was thrown away during flush operation. <28>Feb 16...

has someone an idee what to do to get them reconnecterd ?

after a short config change on the switch many nodes of the cluster cant find the rest of the cluster how to get them reconnected (proxmox latest verison of 4.x) Quorum information ------------------ Date: Wed Feb 15 13:05:40 2017 Quorum provider: corosync_votequorum Nodes...

raider was working on proxmox 3.x witout problem i have not tested it on 4.x but i suspect it is working

has someone an idee how to work around this problem ?

yes i know we dont want to have local users the ldfap bind has the problem that it dont support non anonymous bind. and always adding a patch to a file will make it hard to update the system.

the problem is that we use an IPA server that requres an non anonymous bind.

Error: Login failed. Please try again i have taken a look at the pam auth code: it looks like it reads the users from /etc/passwd|shadow file but the user is not in in any of this files it is in kerberos/ldap (IPA) server (can't use the ldap auth our ipa system requires non anonymous bind so i...

Is there a way to authenticate with the pam sssd module ? in the auth log i can find the pam auth with success but i am unabel to login via webinterface (user in in gui created with admin permissions) {"EventReceivedTime":"2016-08-01...