fstrankowski's latest activity
-
fstrankowski replied to the thread Proxmox web UI accessible but shell returns Error 500: close (rename) atomic file.....You created your account today and all of your 3 posts so far contain only AI Slop. What are your intentions at this point? -
fstrankowski reacted to Neobin's post in the thread [SOLVED] Potential bug in Proxmox when passing through PCI device with
Like.
Disable/Uncheck: "All Functions". -
fstrankowski replied to the thread [SOLVED] Getting bounces for email sent to you@example.com.Did you recently changed the mail address and still have have mails in your queue with the wrong receipient?? postqueue -j
-
fstrankowski replied to the thread User login failed.Did you select the correct realm for the root user?
-
fstrankowski replied to the thread Need help - Active Snapshoot Notification.Please remove your IP from the screenshot above. GMail does not accept the mail because you are not sending it from a properly configured mailserver. There are tutorials to configure Proxmox to be able to send mails using gmail.
-
fstrankowski replied to the thread Need help - Active Snapshoot Notification.What does postfix say? journalctl -u postfix -n 30
-
fstrankowski replied to the thread Filesystem choice for consumer SSD.The only reason coming to my mind would be an absurdly low amount of RAM. Anything else?
-
fstrankowski replied to the thread Einführung von Einschränkungen / Kennzeichnungspflicht von KI-Beiträgen.Genau dabei helfen Diskussionen wie diese hier. Bleiben wir mal bei Proxmox dann können wir festlegen, dass die Modelle zu einem maßgeblichen Anteil durch eben dieses Forum hier befüttert werden. Daher ist es nicht nur in unserem, sondern...
-
fstrankowski reacted to *alx*'s post in the thread Einführung von Einschränkungen / Kennzeichnungspflicht von KI-Beiträgen with Like.
Wenn, dann sollte man die KI Beiträge am Anfang kennzeichnen. Dann kann ich mir das Lesen auch sparen. Wenn ich eine Antwort von einer KI haben will, dann befrage ich selber eine. Und wenn sich jemand nicht die Mühe macht seine Beiträge selber zu...
-
fstrankowski replied to the thread [SOLVED] Getting bounces for email sent to you@example.com.Do you run other PVE or even PBS instances?
-
fstrankowski replied to the thread [SOLVED] Getting bounces for email sent to you@example.com.Datacenter > ACME > Accounts? Datacenter > Notifications > Targets?
-
fstrankowski replied to the thread [SOLVED] Getting bounces for email sent to you@example.com.Did you check Datacenter -> Users -> root@pam ?
-
fstrankowski replied to the thread Server/VM not appearing under router connected devices.More than welcome. In either case of success or failure, come back and we might figure out a workaround! Good luck in the meantime!
-
fstrankowski replied to the thread Einführung von Einschränkungen / Kennzeichnungspflicht von KI-Beiträgen.Wie ich sagte, es geht hier nicht darum mit dem Finger auf Forumsmitglieder zu zeigen. Die Beiträge sind leicht zu finden und zu erkennen, sowohl im deutschsprachigen- wie auch im englischsprachigen Forumsteil.
-
fstrankowski replied to the thread Network Optimization for High-Volume UDP Traffic in PVE.Is your client able to multithread said application? I've seen (long time ago) a very nice talk from Valve about defending DDoS attacks in online games. Different topic but with the same technical aspect - PPS vs Bandwidth. Latter one neglectable...
-
fstrankowski posted the thread Einführung von Einschränkungen / Kennzeichnungspflicht von KI-Beiträgen in Proxmox VE (Deutsch/German).Ich bitte um eine Diskussion/RFC zu o.g. Thematik. Mittlerweile nehmen die Beiträge welche erkenn- und nachweisbar zu nahezu ausschließlich KI-Content bestehen massiv überhand. Besteht die Möglichkeit dies einzuschränken und/oder eine...
-
Der KI-Bot hängt... :rolleyes:
-
fstrankowski replied to the thread Network Optimization for High-Volume UDP Traffic in PVE.I'm totally with you. Its not about the traffic amount, its about the pps, thats the bottleneck. My question was just aiming at the possibility that your network equipment might bottleneck aswell and was just curious if you ruled that possibility...
-
fstrankowski replied to the thread Network Optimization for High-Volume UDP Traffic in PVE.Have the tests been performed without any interfering L2/L3 equipment between VM and Client? If not, how did you rule out its not the networking equipment inbetween?
-
fstrankowski replied to the thread Server/VM not appearing under router connected devices.Welcome to the Forum. Could you please be more specific as in what exactly you try to accomplish. As far as i understand is that you want to port forward incoming connections on your router to a VM on your Proxmox server. What do you mean by...