flames's latest activity
-
Fflames reacted to cwt's post in the thread Way more NAGware, very little functionality, bugs galore with
Like.
I believe both points are valid to a certain extent. It is entirely reasonable that Proxmox developers are compensated for their work, and subscription models are clearly appropriate for production environments. The concern many users express is... -
Fflames reacted to news's post in the thread Significant IOPS Drop in Proxmox 9.1.9 VMs Compared to Other Hypervisors with Like.
Please don't write in Bold and Black! It's horrible to read with a black screen config.
-
Fflames reacted to UdoB's post in the thread Significant IOPS Drop in Proxmox 9.1.9 VMs Compared to Other Hypervisors with Like.
You did not say anything of the underlying filesystems...? For ZFS it may be expected as ZFS does a lot more work than classic filesystems under the hood, resulting in multiple IO-operations used for metadata etc...
-
Fflames reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.2 available! with Like.
We are excited to announce the release of Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.2. This release focuses heavily on platform refinement, stability, and core optimization. Proxmox VE 9.2 is built on the robust Debian 13.5 "Trixie" and ships with Linux...
-
Fflames reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.2 available! with Like.
We are excited to announce the release of Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.2. This release focuses heavily on platform refinement, stability, and core optimization. Proxmox VE 9.2 is built on the robust Debian 13.5 "Trixie" and ships with Linux...
-
Fflames reacted to janus57's post in the thread Secure Boot – Microsoft UEFI CA 2023 Certificate Not Included in EFI Disk with Like.
Hi, Your post pick my interest, so I came across this blog post : https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/blog/windows-itpro-blog/updating-microsoft-secure-boot-keys/4055324 which include a fairly simple solution, the only thing is you need to...
-
Fflames reacted to cwt's post in the thread [SOLVED] Are there any companies that extensively use PVE in daily production environments? with Like.
You can purchase different subscriptions to receive support directly from Proxmox (fast and very professional) if desired. Proxmox VE and their other products are very mature. We use their products on every customer site, ranging from small...
-
Fflames reacted to Johannes S's post in the thread [SOLVED] Are there any companies that extensively use PVE in daily production environments? with Like.
They have some success stories on their page: https://www.proxmox.com/en/about/about-us/stories There was also a survey on reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Proxmox/s/aGMBgJqm0L
-
Fflames reacted to bbgeek17's post in the thread [SOLVED] Are there any companies that extensively use PVE in daily production environments? with Like.
While these threads are storage-slanted, the feedback it the threads is from companies running successful businesses, almost exclusively on Proxmox Virtualization Environment...
-
Fflames reacted to EllerholdAG's post in the thread [SOLVED] Are there any companies that extensively use PVE in daily production environments? with Like.
Yes we have 3 cluster in production.
-
Fflames reacted to LnxBil's post in the thread [SOLVED] Are there any companies that extensively use PVE in daily production environments? with Like.
What do you mean by extensively? Most people use it as their only virtualization platform in various setups for many years, even decades. A few years ago, there was a post by Proxmox stuff about the install numbers, yet I cannot find it anymore...
-
FWe're pleased to announce the release of Proxmox Backup Server 4.2. This version is based on Debian 13.4 ("Trixie"), uses Linux kernel 7.0 as the new stable default for improved hardware support, and comes with ZFS 2.4 for reliable...
-
Fflames reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Opt-in Linux 7.0 Kernel for Proxmox VE 9 available with Like.
We recently uploaded the 7.0 (rc6) kernel to our repositories. The current default kernel for the Proxmox VE 9 series is still 6.17, but 7.0 is now an option. We plan to use the 7.0 kernel as the new default for the upcoming Proxmox VE 9.2 and...
-
Fflames reacted to sbarmen's post in the thread Ceph 20.2 Tentacle Release Available as test preview and Ceph 18.2 Reef soon to be fully EOL with Like.
Just upgraded myself. Went just fine no issues. 3 OSDs. I got some interesting data after upgrading: Ceph Squid → Tentacle Upgrade Benchmark Summary Cluster: 3-node Proxmox (Intel NUC14, NVMe) Pool: ceph-vms (replicated, size 2 / min_size 2)...
-
Fflames reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Ceph 20.2 Tentacle Release Available as test preview and Ceph 18.2 Reef soon to be fully EOL with Like.
Hi Community! The recently released Ceph 20.2 Tentacle is now available on the Proxmox Ceph test repository for installation or upgrade. Upgrades from Squid to Tentacle: You can find the upgrade how-to here...
-
Fflames replied to the thread Feature request - zfs delegation with lxc.Probably yes. Tho it is some QoL stuff in rare usecases, I am with Fabian [1] [2], and beside that, it could tear a security hole and create chaos.
-
Fflames reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Proxmox Datacenter Manager 1.0 (stable) with Like.
We're very excited to present the first stable release of our new Proxmox Datacenter Manager! Proxmox Datacenter Manager is an open-source, centralized management solution to oversee and manage multiple, independent Proxmox-based environments...
-
Fflames reacted to ivenae's post in the thread [TUTORIAL] Integrate rspamd as custom script with Like.
The Script works without jq. The drawback of the custom script is that no further SpamAssassin checks are executed if the returned score is greater than 5.0 and I often had the issue that the custom check seemed too high from my perspective. At...