Recent content by Firebat

I would say that the Initialization is complete. I tried to write some data to the tape. That works, even if it is not as fast as expected, between 80 MB/s and 160 MB/s. But unfortunately I don't have any values for comparison. The underlying datastore is HDD only, so maybe that's normal. Right...

Hi folks! I've got a tape library/changer with one LTO9 drive attached via SAS to a Broadcom/Avago/LSI 9500-8e HBA. I'm not able to slow format any of the tapes in this library. proxmox-tape format --drive ibm-lto9 --fast 0 alwas throws an error: TASK ERROR: erase failed - scsi command...

This works very well. x86-64-v3 as cpu type does the trick here :)

Same here, but I'm not sure what triggered it. The issue is Windows 11, all my Win 10 machines work just fine. I can confirm this on three different hosts with different Nvidia GRID GPUs (2x M60, 1x Quadro RTX 8000).

Does it support r8126, too?

Hab keine VMs oder Container, bei denen das zum Tragen käme.

Nee, ich tausche nur das Board, der Rest bleibt identisch. OK, die Netzwerkinterfaces werden vermutlich anders durchnummeriert, das ist kein Thema. Mir geht's nur darum, ob ich die SSDs einfach wieder anstecken kann und dann startet der Kram schon, oder ob ich mir vorher irgendwelche...

Hallo Leute, im Homelab möchte ich das Mainboard meines (einzigen!) Proxmox-Hosts tauschen. Aktuell läuft Proxmox auf einem ZFS Mirror aus zwei SSDs. Die würde ich gerne ohne Neuinstallation weiterverwenden. Reicht es, einfach das Board zu tauschen und alles andere funktioniert wie gewohnt, oder...

The integration of CEPH into Proxmox makes it really easy to setup shared storage. We use a 3-node-Ceph-Cluster only for storage, no virtualization but I would recommend at least 5 nodes for Ceph in terms of availability and resilience. Another option, like blockbride, would be linstor/drbd...

Yes, but this just happened after kernel change and wasn't an issue from 6.2 to 6.5 in the past. I would expect this to be enabled by default or at least with a warning or information in the release notes... Just tried to update a second host and again only the X710 interfaces are affected.

I have problems with the new 6.8 kernel. Is it possible that the interface names change with an Intel X710 card? With 6.5 my interface was called enp99s0f0, with the 6.8 kernel the same interface is now called enp99s0f0np0. This tears up the entire network configuration...

UDS Enterprise works well with Proxmox. Havn't tried Version 3.6 yet, but 3.4 afair was relatively easy to setup.

And there are still issues with ZFS 2.2.1… https://www.phoronix.com/news/OpenZFS-Data-Corruption-Battle

Yes I did. Fixes staged for 2.2.1, but 2.2.1 is also affected, so that's not a solution for the mentioned issues.

Upgrade went smooth on a 3-node cluster, lets see if it stays that way. :) No need for manual restart of the managers here.