Recent content by felix_84

Thanks for reply. CPUs are Xeon Gold 6130 and 5218. I think latency is the key. WAN performance totally depends on it So as for now Proxmox does not allow geographical distributed clustering to be deployed with PVE storage replication utilising full bw of high speed links. This is very frustrating

Now logs looks like this Sep 12 09:48:06 mailgw postfix/smtpd[13604]: proxy-reject: END-OF-MESSAGE: 554 5.7.1 Rejected for policy reasons (82B945F5C6F25251C5); from=<user@google.com> to=<user@domain.com> proto=ESMTP helo=<mail-wm1-f46.google.com> Thanks again for your help!

Thank you for pointing me out, i just realised that i used main.cf templating before 'before queue filtering' was implemented, so the template i was using is just missing this feature. New template has this construction [% IF ! pmg.mail.before_queue_filtering -%] Here is the similar question...

The only modifications i was made, is header checks in /etc/pmg/templates/main.cf.in header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header_checks

Sep 8 12:12:26 mailgw pmg-smtp-filter[4601]: 826885F574AF9A0274: block mail to <user@domain.com> (rule: Drop Blacklist) Sep 8 12:12:26 mailgw pmg-smtp-filter[4601]: 826885F574AF9A0274: processing time: 0.879 seconds (0.792, 0.053, 0) Sep 8 12:12:26 mailgw postfix/lmtp[4817]: 9152C82687...

Thank you for reply! But in Tracking Center it still shows blocked instead of rejected. Is this correct?

Hello to all. Is it possible to reject some mail domains and addresses at smtp level without editing postfix configs (smtpd_sender_restrictions). Is before queue filtering can help?

Thank you for reply. I have already done this. Unfortunately, official documentation does not provide detailed info, except this setting the proper Operating System(OS) allows Proxmox VE to optimize some low level parameters. For instance Windows OS expect the BIOS clock to use the local...

Hi all. Could anyone explain the situation, when during install Windows guest i choose OS Type 'Linux' by mistake? After install i powered off the VM and choose correct one, but could it be some errors or performance issues? Thank you

Hello and thanks for reply. Actually i cant say for sure, because NFS was configured a long time ago on a windows machine and worked decently, more or less. Raid controller has no BBU.

After some investiogations we suddenly discovered that our NFS storage is too slow. dd shows 10-15Mb/s on gigabit link. Also we use pigz to speed up gzip backups. So during backup CPU went above 40% and io delay was spiked to 10%. Also host with 64Gb RAM (60% usage) swapped actively during...

It does not look like kernel panic, but vm is unresponsive Jan 9 20:31:31 servername kernel: [463522.292945] NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#6 stuck for 22s! [java:1239] Jan 9 20:31:31 servername kernel: [463522.293611] Modules linked in: binfmt_misc shpchp joydev input_leds serio_raw...

Today, second vm was crashed during backup. So this is not a guest problem.

Could you please link it to me?