djsami's latest activity
-
Ddjsami replied to the thread Horrible download speeds from enterprise.proxmox.com (120 KB/s in 2026?).Hi, Thank you! The temporary host entry actually worked perfectly on my Linux server. As you can see below, wget pulled the ISO via 45.144.208.36 with great speed (~58 MB/s) and without any drops: Bash [root@cpanel06 ~]<span># wget...
-
Ddjsami reacted to fabian's post in the thread Horrible download speeds from enterprise.proxmox.com (120 KB/s in 2026?) with
Like.
I've forwarded this thread to our infrastructure team - these kind of peering issues happen from time to time unfortunately. -
Ddjsami replied to the thread Horrible download speeds from enterprise.proxmox.com (120 KB/s in 2026?).We tried 3 different operators, most likely there is a connection problem between Türkiye and Proxmox, this problem has been going on for about 6-7 months. Tracing route to at1.cdn.proxmox.com [45.144.208.36] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1...
-
Ddjsami replied to the thread Horrible download speeds from enterprise.proxmox.com (120 KB/s in 2026?).I've tried mobile, fiber, and in different cities, and they all have the same problem; it's not downloading. If it worked for you, could you please share the Google Drive link?
-
Ddjsami posted the thread Horrible download speeds from enterprise.proxmox.com (120 KB/s in 2026?) in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.Hi everyone, I'm trying to download the latest Proxmox VE ISO (proxmox-ve_9.2-1.iso) from the official enterprise repository, and to be honest, the download speeds are absolutely unacceptable. I am getting a frustrating 120-130 KB/sec transfer...
-
-
Ddjsami posted the thread [SOLVED] Veeam v12 Native Proxmox Integration - Delivering 4.9 Gbps Backup Speeds to Offsite Storage in Proxmox VE: Networking and Firewall.Hello Proxmox Community, I wanted to share my recent experience integrating Veeam Backup & Replication v12 with Proxmox VE. We've successfully moved away from agent-based backups to Veeam's new native Proxmox support, and the results are...
-
-
Ddjsami posted the thread PMG Network Issue: ARP Incomplete on Hetzner vSwitch (VLAN Tagged) - Fresh Install Fails in Mail Gateway: Installation and configuration.Hi everyone, I am experiencing a persistent networking issue with a fresh installation of Proxmox Mail Gateway on a Hetzner Dedicated Root Server. Despite having 29 other virtual machines running perfectly on the same host and vSwitch, this new...
-
Ddjsami replied to the thread [SOLVED] Applying pve-qemu-kvm 10.2.1-1 may cause extremely high “I/O Delay” and extremely high “I/O pressure stalls”. (Patches in the test repository.I fully understand and accept your point regarding the repository hierarchy. You are right; relying on the test-repo for a production environment of this scale was a risk that ultimately fell on me, regardless of how stable it had been over the...
-
Ddjsami replied to the thread [SOLVED] Applying pve-qemu-kvm 10.2.1-1 may cause extremely high “I/O Delay” and extremely high “I/O pressure stalls”. (Patches in the test repository.Let’s be clear: I have been managing this 1,200+ node infrastructure for over 2 years using this exact same repository structure without a single critical regression—until now. While you point out it's a "test" repo, in a professional...
-
Ddjsami replied to the thread [SOLVED] Applying pve-qemu-kvm 10.2.1-1 may cause extremely high “I/O Delay” and extremely high “I/O pressure stalls”. (Patches in the test repository.I am writing this to express my deep frustration regarding the pve-qemu-kvm 10.2.1-1 update. I manage a massive infrastructure of over 1,200 nodes, and this untested update has caused significant distress across my entire operation. I have spent...
-
Ddjsami replied to the thread [SOLVED] Applying pve-qemu-kvm 10.2.1-1 may cause extremely high “I/O Delay” and extremely high “I/O pressure stalls”. (Patches in the test repository.I've been using the test for two years and this is the first time something like this has happened to me. I will be downgrading this other cluster structure after 4:00 AM.
-
-
Ddjsami reacted to monkfish's post in the thread [SOLVED] Applying pve-qemu-kvm 10.2.1-1 may cause extremely high “I/O Delay” and extremely high “I/O pressure stalls”. (Patches in the test repository with Like.
Inneresting! I did not have that occur on mine. For sure the proxmox team will identify the reason why - lets remember this is a package published to test so those of us brave enough to use that will know the caveats. I reckon you might want to...
-
Ddjsami replied to the thread [SOLVED] Applying pve-qemu-kvm 10.2.1-1 may cause extremely high “I/O Delay” and extremely high “I/O pressure stalls”. (Patches in the test repository.pve-qemu-kvm 10.2.1-1 pve-qemu-kvm 10.1.2-7 There's a difference of more than 25%. Not only IOPS but also CPU and, naturally, RAM usage has decreased.
-
-
Ddjsami reacted to monkfish's post in the thread [SOLVED] Applying pve-qemu-kvm 10.2.1-1 may cause extremely high “I/O Delay” and extremely high “I/O pressure stalls”. (Patches in the test repository with Like.
Excellent! Thing is, as alluded to previously, I dont actually think its increased io. I'm not the worlds best at iotop but I wasnt seeing any difference - only in the realtime bar i/o delay and the io pressure stall graph. Good luck hunting...
-
Ddjsami replied to the thread [SOLVED] Applying pve-qemu-kvm 10.2.1-1 may cause extremely high “I/O Delay” and extremely high “I/O pressure stalls”. (Patches in the test repository.Quick update: I have just downgraded pve-qemu-kvm from 10.2.1-1 to 10.1.2-7 on my nodes, and I can confirm that all IO Delay and IO Pressure issues have completely disappeared. Before the downgrade, I was seeing a constant 20-25% IO Delay even...
-
-
Ddjsami replied to the thread [SOLVED] Applying pve-qemu-kvm 10.2.1-1 may cause extremely high “I/O Delay” and extremely high “I/O pressure stalls”. (Patches in the test repository.Glad to hear you can reproduce it. To provide more data: I have tested this across my entire rack of servers (multiple nodes), and the result is identical on every single one. They are all experiencing the same ~20-25% IO Delay since the 10.2.1-1...
-
-
Ddjsami reacted to fiona's post in the thread [SOLVED] Applying pve-qemu-kvm 10.2.1-1 may cause extremely high “I/O Delay” and extremely high “I/O pressure stalls”. (Patches in the test repository with Like.
I can reproduce the issue locally and will look into it.
-
Ddjsami replied to the thread [SOLVED] Applying pve-qemu-kvm 10.2.1-1 may cause extremely high “I/O Delay” and extremely high “I/O pressure stalls”. (Patches in the test repository.I'm in the same situation, I couldn't figure out why it was like this either. I'll try dropping all the virtual currencies to 10.1 tonight.
-
-
Ddjsami posted the thread High IO Delay (20-25%) on AMD EPYC 7502P / Tyan S8050 with NVMe (LVM-Thin) - Despite High FIO Benchmarks in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.Hi everyone, I am experiencing a persistent high IO Delay (20-25%) on my Proxmox VE 9.1.7 node, even when the system is not under extreme load. I have recently reinstalled the OS multiple times (tried ZFS, BTRFS, and currently LVM-Thin) but the...
-
-
Ddjsami replied to the thread Ceph - VM with high IO wait.I'm experiencing the same thing. There's something strange going on with Proxmox 9.1.1, and for some reason, my IOPS jumps to 500%. I haven't found a solution. The actual disk is fast, but slower than Proxmox :D I think there's something...
-
