Recent content by delpiero3

Anyone?

Hi everyone, i am coming back to you because situation evolved a bit. I was planning to go with ZFS because the performance were better overall and i wouldn't have to configure my disks in RAID10 to have something decent but in RAIDZ3, but still i have strange behavior and things i can't figure...

I will probably go back to hardware Raid and leave this one as is, sorry for the one who would stumble on this thread and not find the solution. I have spend some time to try to figure it out, but overall my spare time doesn't allow me to troubleshoot too much on ZFS, i don't know enough about...

ho wait, reading more carefully the logs, it is the other way around, the import through cache file is ok, but then the system tries a bunch of import by scanning and it all fails. Why would it behave like that sounds strange to me ? ● zfs-import-cache.service - Import ZFS pools by cache file...

Aug 18 18:29:23 proxmox systemd[1]: Starting zfs-import-cache.service - Import ZFS pools by cache file... Aug 18 18:29:12 proxmox udevadm[1723]: systemd-udev-settle.service is deprecated. Please fix nut-driver@EATON.service, zfs-import-scan.service, zfs-import-cache.service not to pull it in...

Hi everyone, i already went over several posts looking for solutions for my issue, but so far i had no luck : https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/failed-to-start-import-zfs-pool.109347/page-2 https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/zfs-pool-import-fails-problem-with-cache-file-how-to-fix.61925/...

I was able to recover most of my stuff, transfer ended successfully with an average final bandwidth of 280MB/s, not the fastest for sure, but enough for what i need to do for now. I thank you all for the help, now i just have to reconfigure all my environment and dockers, a lot to do but at...

At least that's not what i see on my side, maybe i am lucky in my mistake indeed, but still right now, i can tell that after 10TB transferred of the VM disk the bandwidth is still steady at 340MB/s, which is honest from my perspective. when the setup was with the 12 disks in Raid10, i ended up...

In 2,5" you don't find any consumer HDD with that capacity, or at least i couldn't find any by myself. I agree with you, tendency in computers is to go for cheap and bad ... so sad. I tried already this and was able to perform sequential write on 2 HDD of the lot over the entire drive keeping a...

Hi there, sure, about IOPS i agree, but the sequential write performance should scale, right ? At least, that's what i am mainly looking at for that volume, as explained in my use case, this volume will store movies, sitcoms, books, music and pictures that i want to share through Plex Media...

Hi everyone, thanks for the tips, i left draid aside for now, it anyway looks more complex than RaidZ approach and i must say that i am still too newbie in context of ZFS to even consider draid for now. I took a look for the vblock size, went in datacenter => storage => changed my raidZ1 vblock...

I am not sure I follow, in the documentation I shared, they say from 10 to 15 drives, I have 12x 5TB, isn't it what is expected?

Thanks for the tip, looks like this is indeed my issue. Shouldn't i go for a dRaid instead ? looks to be more in line with my use case, as it looks to be a good fit for larger amount of drive raid : https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/chapter-sysadmin.html#sysadmin_zfs_raid_considerations...

it is a LVM. The entire volume is 40TB , and 36TB are assigned to the VM disk vm-101-disk-0. Initially, i created one ZFS volume in RAID10 with 18 disks of 5TB, so a volume of 45TB, the transfer was working, i was at 50% done after 7hours, which looks to be a fair bandwidth transfer of 700MB/s...

No, it is smaller, 36TB for the vm-101-disk-0 and the movie ZFS pool is 48TB and has nothing on it right now. Even trying to manually create a disk as you can see in one of the screenshot lead to the same issue, while i was trying to create a 30TB disk size (i know the error message overlap the...